While the government has announced it would open up eight domestic airports to handle direct cross-strait chartered flights, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Civil Aviation Administration held a military drill earlier last month at Shijiazhuang Airport, Hebei Province, assessing eight civilian aircraft on long-range air drops in emergency situations.
This provided ample evidence that the apprehensions of national security specialists that China could adopt a “Trojan horse” strategy against Taiwan were well founded.
There have been precedents for the employment of this strategy. For instance, Israel staged successful military operations using civilian aircraft as cover for both Operation Entebbe in 1967 and Operation Babylon in 1981. Now that Taiwan’s important dual-purpose (civilian and military) airports are to be opened, the security at these airports will be compromised.
Philip Breedlove, vice director of the US’ Joint Staff for Strategic Plans and Policy, recently stated at a congressional hearing that Beijing had completed required military preparations and launched drills along the coastline across Taiwan prior to the March presidential election in the eventuality that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate won the election and the UN referendums passed.
At the time, cross-strait relations were in such a precarious state that the US Pacific Command dispatched three aircraft carriers — the USS Kitty Hawk, the USS Nimitz and the USS Abraham Lincoln — to the waters just outside the territorial waters in the Taiwan Strait.
Sixty US warships and hundreds of combat aircraft also gathered in the area, resulting in the largest deployment in the region since the 1958 Taiwan Strait Crisis. The mobilization even dwarfed the 1996 crisis. This is evidence of the extent to which China covets Taiwan and of the US government’s determination to safeguard Taiwan.
The most worrying development, however, was that in order to improve cross-strait relations and not “provoke” Beijing, the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has allegedly delayed arms sales from the US. The administration of US President George W Bush also froze a US$11 billion arms package for Taiwan, ostensibly over worries that Taipei was not determined enough to enhance its self-defense capabilities.
The Ma government’s ambiguity on arms procurement, its aloofness in its relations with the US and bellicose attitude vis-a-vis Japan over the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) islands incident — an indication of drifting national strategy — have begun to erode the foundations of mutual trust between the three countries. Little wonder that Robert Shutter, a professor at Georgetown University who once worked for the CIA, warned last month that Taiwan should make sure it fully understands the fundamental interest of the US government. If the government turns away from the US and curries favor with Beijing, the US would not rule out achieving agreements with Beijing at the expense of Taiwan.
There is no national defense without psychological defense. The Ma administration has failed to build such psychological protection against China’s military threat and has instead drawn close to China without distinguishing between friend and foe.
This shortcoming represents the biggest threat to Taiwan’s national sovereignty.
Chen Kuo-hsiung is vice general-secretary of the World United Formosans for Independence and general-secretary of the Taiwan National Security Institute.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS