President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said he hopes that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Youth League can produce a person like Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). In saying this, Ma is himself becoming increasingly similar to Hu. In terms of anti-democratic and anti-Japanese sentiment and singing praises for communist autocracy, Ma and Hu are now almost comrades who dance to the same tune.
On the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) issue, Hu permitted angry youths in China to express anti-Japanese sentiment to demonstrate the importance China places on issues of sovereignty.
But Hu is playing politics — the Diaoyutai islets are only 4km² in size. If China holds sovereignty in high regard, why would it sign an agreement with Moscow to waive its claim to land that was taken away by Russia to the equivalent of 360,000 Diaoyutais?
The same goes for Ma. If the KMT considers sovereignty to be important, why does it not pursue the 9.6 million square kilometers of territory that belonged to the Republic of China that is under communist control?
Ma’s approval of anti-Japanese sentiment is also a game aimed at diverting attention from the fact that his inauguration was closely followed by a huge drop in the stock market, hikes in oil, gaffes by his appointees and a manifest lack of political ability.
In his annual comments on the Tiananmen Square Massacre, Ma praised China’s rescue efforts after the Sichuan earthquake.
What does the earthquake have to do with Tiananmen? The massacre was mass murder.
Besides, in the crucial 72 hours that followed the earthquake, Hu’s government refused assistance that was offered by other countries, including Taiwan. It is difficult to ascertain just how many people lost their lives under rubble because of the delay in assistance. Still, this is another form of murder. Disregard for life because of ideology is the most sinful act of an autocratic power. But Ma lacked the sense to take this into account.
Even more outrageous is the fact that Ma once won the admiration of Chinese democracy activists for condemning the massacre. Immediately after his inauguration, however, Ma said nothing of substance.
Some Chinese writers were outraged and this is perfectly understandable. Beijing-based author Liu Zili (劉自立) decried Ma’s fawning over Beijing and said his stance on the Tiananmen Square Massacre as debauched.
Liao Tien-chi (廖天琪), the editor of Observer (觀察), a magazine published by the China Information Center, said that Ma’s praise for China made his blood boil. A Mainlander who grew up in Taiwan, Liao wrote that it was pitiful for the Taiwanese people to have given their fate over to someone like Ma, and that Ma’s speech on the anniversary of the massacre made him feel as if Taiwanese needed an elegy to lament their new president.
Pu Ta-chung (卜大中), chief writer at the Chinese-language Apple Daily, offered up more severe language. He said Ma’s address on the anniversary of Tiananmen substituted the earthquake for the issues of democracy and human rights, in what amounted to a sleight of hand.
On Ma’s praise for media liberalization in China, Pu retorted that the government should not be intervening in the media in the first place, so “liberalization” shouldn’t be an issue; praise for “liberalization” was thus worthless. Pu likened the situation to a criminal who is praised for merely raping when he is accustomed to raping and pillaging.
Ma’s fawning over China can be readily pictured in the mind. It can even be understood.
Yet his emulation of Hu so soon after his inauguration leaves one flabbergasted.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS