President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has been in power for more than a month. During this period, three salient topics have called for analysis.
First is the oil price hike. The government defines this problem as a result of “global inflation pressures.” Although this is true, Ma barely touched on this topic during the election campaign and has yet to tell the public how to deal with the pressure.
Ma has only pledged to conserve energy and reduce carbon emissions, while ascertaining whether key officials at the Presidential Office carry a handkerchief or use reusable utensils. What a painful disappointment this must be for the more than 7 million voters who cast their ballot for him.
Ma should propose more concrete plans to ease the pain caused by inflation. Some simple but straightforward measures are in order. For example, a large number of people would benefit if the government were to halve national highway tolls.
Second is the government’s plan to expand domestic demand. The point is not whether this is a post-election “thank you” to local governments, as the opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) claims. Rather, this plan should be viewed as part of the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) economic policy.
To the KMT, the rationale behind this plan is simple: The public will not suffer if economic growth outpaces price increases. However, the average blue or white-collar worker will not see immediate pay increases even if the economic growth rate increased.
Worst, economic policies like demand expansion could initiate an endless series of expansion processes as incomes are forced higher to keep up with the price hikes. This pursuit is destined to fail.
Third is cross-strait relations. This issue is the main focus of Ma’s administration and has garnered the highest approval. It is unlikely that the DPP would score any points for its recent attacks on the cross-strait issue, as the crux of the matter is not whether direct cargo flights would also be implemented or whether Taiwan has denigrated itself. The focus should be the significant changes that would take place once direct flights commence and Chinese tourists arrive in Taiwan.
The government has yet to tell the public how it intends to handle these challenges. What is clear is that the KMT has a fixed track in mind for cross-strait relations. Following this, Taiwan and China would inevitably get closer. This is not a big problem; the problem is what will happen once this has happened. Putting aside contentious issues such as whether Ma should be addressed as “President Ma” or “Mr Ma,” the question remains: Where will this track lead us?
If what Ma really wants is unification with China, the KMT’s plan should remain unchanged. However, if Ma intends to keep the promises he made in his inaugural speech and work to safeguard the dignity and sovereignty of Taiwan, or the Republic of China, he should propose a concrete plan to consolidate public consensus on Taiwan’s independence and sovereignty while pushing it toward China. Over the past month, we have seen the latter, but not the former.
Ma has said that he has kept the memory of the Tiananmen Square Massacre in mind since that fateful event 19 years ago. Now that Chinese tourists are coming to Taiwan, he can do a lot of things to let them understand the true nature of the Beijing regime and thus open up another track for cross-strait relations.
For example, he could distribute free DVDs highlighting the truth about the massacre. He could also use this opportunity to promote Taiwanese democracy so they can see Beijing’s real face.
In short, there are many things that Ma and his government can but have not even started to do. I believe this is a result of misdefining Taiwan’s future. It is perhaps too early for anyone — especially the DPP, which had just given up power — to grade the new government. Still, from now on, the Ma administration should take the public’s hopes for the nation’s future seriously.
Yao Jen-to is an assistant professor at National Tsing Hua University’s Graduate Institute of Sociology.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
RSS