News that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government was responsible for the freeze in arms procurement from the US, although initially shocking, should not have come as a surprise given the course the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has charted since coming to office.
In little more than four weeks the government has already managed to harm or reverse much of the work of the previous government in protecting Taiwan’s sovereignty and upholding its dignity.
The Ma administration has, in record time, managed to denigrate the nation’s sovereignty and the standing of its leader while ingratiating itself to China, all in return for a few minor economic rewards from Beijing.
But a new low was reached last week when it was revealed that it was the government that requested the US government halt some US$12 billion in arms sales, although now it appears the scene was set several months before Ma took office.
Notwithstanding the vast amounts of money Beijing is investing in improving its war machine, it is a safe bet that many voters did not believe a total freeze was what Ma meant when he promised “not to engage in an arms race with China” ahead of the presidential election.
Many voters who gave their backing to Ma in March would surely have had second thoughts if they had known what he was planning.
Volunteering to put a halt to arms procurement — when a great deal of uncertainty exists over the future of the sales — was a shortsighted, reckless move that could have serious ramifications.
The KMT, as an opposition party, was responsible for a delay of several years for many of the items on the shopping list. Should the delay continue until a new president takes up residence in the White House, the US may decide to make it permanent.
This may seem implausible, but there is legitimate concern as Taipei cuddles ever closer to China that advanced US military technology may eventually fall into Chinese hands.
Add to this the fact that the KMT has already ganged up with the Chinese Communist Party to marginalize the independence movement, and the question follows: What’s to stop the KMT throwing in its chips with a rising China in the battle against the world’s only superpower?
It has been stated time and time again that in order to get what it wants from cross-strait negotiations, Taiwan needs to enter talks from a position of strength, instead of rolling over and exposing its belly like a faithful pooch being petted by its master.
As we saw last week, when Taiwan enters into negotiations with the Chinese at a disadvantage, all it can do is agree to what Beijing wants. It has no bargaining chips with which to stave off China’s aggressive agenda.
Of course, some Taiwanese are tempted by the supposed benefits that will arise from closer economic ties with China, but it is presumptuous in the extreme to think that they would sacrifice their freedom to secure such benefits. The spineless, fawning attitude of this government, should it continue, ignores this and thus poses a very real threat to that freedom.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS