The English spelling system is “absolutely, unspeakably awful.” That is the conclusion of new research that has found that children face 800 words by the age of 11 that hinder their reading because of the way they are spelt.
Monkey, asparagus, spinach, caterpillar, dwarf, banana, handkerchief, pliers, soldiers, stomach, petal and telescope have all been included on the long list of words that baffle children because they contain letter combinations that are more commonly pronounced in a different way.
The words have all been identified as problematic for reading, as opposed to writing, because of their “phonic unreliability,” according to the study The Most Costly English Spellings. It was presented on June 7 at the conference of the Spelling Society, held at Coventry University, England. Masha Bell, the literacy researcher who carried out the work, argued that there were 200 words on the list that could be improved by simply dropping “surplus letters” such as the “i” in friend or the “u” in shoulder.
“English has an absolutely, unspeakably awful spelling system,” said Bell, a former English teacher and author of the book Understanding English Spelling. “It is the worst of all the alphabetical languages. It is unique in that there are not just spelling problems but reading problems. They do not exist anywhere else.”
Bell argued that the spelling system was a huge financial burden on schools and was to blame for poor literacy results compared with the rest of Europe. In Finland, where words are more likely to be pronounced as they look, children learn to read fluently within three months, she said. In the UK, academics have found that it takes three years for a child to acquire a basic level of competence. The tricky spellings make English particularly difficult for children with dyslexia and those from disadvantaged families, who are less likely to be read to regularly by their parents.
In the research Bell highlights examples of words that have the same pronunciation but different letter combinations. Examples include “to” and “two”; “clean” and “gene”; “same” and “aim”; “day” and “grey”; “kite” and “light”; and “stole” and “coal.”
Then there are those that look alike but sound different, with the combinations of “ea,” “ee” and the letter “o” causing most trouble. Among the words falling into that category are “eight” and “height”, “break” and “dreamt”, and “move” and “post.” The letters “ough” can also be pronounced in a number of different ways.
Simplifying the system would transform literacy results, Bell said, but people were resistant to change.
“People feel that they have suffered so much at the hands of English spelling that they are reluctant to look at it,” she said.
Yet other countries have made changes. Last month the parliament in Portugal, where the spelling system is also thought to be complicated, voted to reform and simplify it, bringing it into line with Brazil.
“In 1928 the Turks changed their entire alphabet from Arabic to Latin,” said John Wells, professor of phonetics at University College London and president of the Spelling Society. “It happened in the Soviet Union.”
In Germany there were changes made in the 1990s to make the writing system more consistent. English has also developed with words such as “olde” and “worlde” dropping the “e.”
Wells wants to see things change again and feels there are two possible approaches. The first would be to simplify the way in which words are spelt and then allow people to choose whether to use the new or old system, while the second approach would involve a complete change.
“The Spelling Society favors the first,” he said.
Chris Davis, spokesman for the UK’s National Primary Headteachers’ Association, said the spelling system had a major impact on children’s literacy progress: “It definitely slows English children down. In international comparisons, languages that are phonetically uniform always come top.”
But he said that teachers would be reluctant to see things change.
“It would be such a major revolution that people would find it very difficult to contemplate,” he said. “There are already problems because of the different spelling system in America, but there would also be resistance about going down that route. I think it is an ownership thing, that it is our language.”
Davis said people felt that spelling was linked to the origin of words.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the