DPP should tackle Diaoyutais
It is not unlikely that right now various personnel in the US State Department are regretting their decision to implicitly undermine the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government and help elect “Mr Ma” [Ying-jeou (馬英九)] as president.
The “crisis” over the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) islands has already demonstrated that not only is the president unable or unwilling to act decisively, instead choosing to relegate the authority of the presidency to a symbolic level, he also has little or no control over legislators and members of his own party.
During the DPP’s eight years in power, president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) never initiated or passively supported any conflict with any nation, instead working on the philosophy laid down under former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) of responsible stewardship and international participation.
Indeed, it was Chen’s government that carried out the extensive negotiations on cross-strait links that made it possible for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to ink its recent deal. It also laid down a very healthy relationship with Japan which, after the US, represents our second-best security guarantee.
All this is now under threat because of jingoistic and immature saber-rattling at Japan designed to please Beijing. This troublemaker executive, masquerading as “reasonable” and “democratic,” is little more than a puppet show. The Republic of China (ROC) is back — for its swan song.
Taiwan’s historical, political, economic and cultural ties to Japan are of immense value and should not be allowed to stagnate because this short-sighted and voraciously greedy government rushes across the Strait to kowtow for peanuts in return.
This puerile tit-for-tat diplomatic spat with Japan demonstrates that whereas “Taiwan” was responsible, the “ROC” is willfully reckless; where “Taiwan” was steadfast, the “ROC” capitulates; and where “Taiwan” was maturing, the “ROC” throws a temper tantrum when its own citizens break long-standing maritime agreements as well as critical domestic law.
Thus the key problem underlying this dispute would seem to be an absence of the rule of law in Taiwan, a gaping hole in our democracy that allows individuals and governments to bypass or ignore the law at will. Action needs to be taken to demonstrate to Japan that Taiwan will make more efforts to respect international maritime law and behave in a manner befitting a nation that embodies such regional strategic significance.
The DPP could organize a delegation to Japan to resolve this crisis and begin negotiations for an economic and security “understanding.” There exists a good foundation for mutually respectful discussion since the Japanese learned to trust the DPP government.
DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) could ask Taiwan’s former representative to Japan Koh Se-kai (�?�) and former presidents Chen and Lee to head the group, given their experience, expertise, knowledge and good relations with Japan.
Since all of these figures are now retired from active political service, they would visit in their capacity as concerned citizens.
It would also help to assure the Japanese that whatever radical and unpredictable direction this unsteady government might make, in four years’ time they will hopefully be able to resume their partnership with a more reasonable and professional DPP administration.
Ben Goren
Keelung
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS