The incident involving a Taiwanese fishing boat that sunk when it was hit by a Japan Coast Guard patrol boat has drawn a lot of criticism in Taiwan and according to reports, this matter has also attracted a lot of attention in Japan.
Serious conflicts over territory are common even between friendly nations.
Taiwan and Japan have close relations that are constantly improving. Relations between both sides are now at the highest point they have been in 50 years.
Hopefully the leaders of Taiwan and Japan will be able to solve this conflict in a calm manner.
The best way of handling this matter is for both parties to make the truth of the incident known and then come up with ways to make amends.
While this issue involved a fishing boat, the crux of the matter is territorial sovereignty. If the Diaoyutais belong to Taiwan, then a Taiwanese boat fishing within its own territory is legal.
On the other hand, if the Diaoyutais belong to Japan, the actions carried out by the Japan Coast Guard were also legal. In the second case, it should still be asked whether Japan’s actions were excessive.
The Diaoyutai archipelago is made up of uninhabited islands, and from early times only fishermen from the Ryuku islands and Taiwan fished there. The area’s small, narrow geography makes it unsuitable for habitation and therefore the sovereignty of the area was never really an issue.
Later, according to the Treaty of Shimonoseki signed by Japan and the Qing court of China, Taiwan was ceded to Japan. Fishermen from Taiwan and the Ryuku islands continued to fish as they had done in the past with no conflict.
Japanese fishermen even erected racks for drying fish on the islets.
After World War II, when the US occupied the Ryukus, the US military used the Diaoyutais as a shooting range until 1972, when it returned the Ryukyus to Japan.
Ever since then the area has been effectively ruled by Japan.
Japan legally gave up its claim to Taiwan when the San Francisco Peace Treaty came into effect in 1952. Since then, some have claimed that Taiwan is a sovereign nation, while others claim that its status is uncertain.
But the Taiwanese public and government have never declared ownership of the Diaoyutai in an international forum.
The Diaoyutais attracted much international attention when reports some years ago suggested that there were oil reserves in the area.
That was the time when the Republic of China on Taiwan asserted its ownership over the islets.
Meanwhile, because the People’s Republic of China believes that Taiwan is a part of its territory, it views the islets as part of its own territory.
It is therefore evident that Beijing’s claims to the islets are hard to accept.
This incident has happened at a time when Taiwan-Japan relations are warming.
Hopefully, the Taiwanese and Japanese governments can negotiate peacefully and rationally based on their friendship and resolve the matter appropriately while maintaining their mutual interests.
From history and experience, we know that the negotiation of sovereign issues is often time-consuming.
To maintain friendly relations in the long term, the Taiwanese and Japanese governments should come up with a temporary solution so that they can share the waters for fishing and marine resources.
Ng Chiau-tong is chairman of World United Formosans for Independence.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON AND EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS