Singaporean correction
Liou You-shine’s (劉侑學) article (“Singapore reflects the pitfalls of China ties,” June 10, page 8) gave inaccurate information about Singapore Airlines. I would like to clear up a few points.
Singapore Airlines currently has 7,000 crewmembers, of whom 60 percent are female and 40 percent are male. Eighty-five percent of female employees are from Singapore and Malaysia, while the other 15 percent are from Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, Indonesia, India, Japan and South Korea.
Singapore Airlines employs foreign crewmembers to offer better service to travelers from different parts of the world. We do not employ foreign staff to cut costs. Singapore Airlines pays special attention to the specific needs of each individual traveler. For example, on flights to Taiwan, two crewmembers from Taiwan are on board to serve Taiwanese travelers and offer a flight experience customers keep coming back for.
Wu Pei-nan
Public relations manager
Singapore Airlines
A name is a name is a name
It appears that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has been secretly plotting to restore the name of Republic of China (ROC) to its former glory.
Shortly after Ma took office, the Presidential Office removed the Chinese characters for “Taiwan” from its Web site, but left the word “Taiwan” in the English version. The reason given by spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) was that the international community tended to be more confused about the nation’s title, while Taiwanese were not (“Presidential Office removes ‘Taiwan’ from its Web site,” May 23, page 3).
I totally disagree with Wang. The international community follows the rules and policies of the UN, which clearly states that “one China” means the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and not the Republic of China, which exists now only in history books.
The Wall Street Journal’s weekend edition for June 7 and June 8 said the name of the country was Taiwan, also known as the Republic of China, which is officially claimed by the PRC as part of China, but is in fact an independent state. So the world community knows that Taiwan is an independent country formerly known as the ROC.
It is the people in Taiwan who are confused about their country’ name since its withdrawal from the UN in 1971. The reason is that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its diehard followers have been fooling people in Taiwan into believing that they still live in a fantasyland called the “ Republic of China.” How absurd.
When the ROC began having trouble getting accepted into international organizations, the KMT started tinkering with names, including “Chinese Taipei.”
The latest tinkering by the Ma administration amounts to meddling with the PRC’s internal affairs. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) has recommended using the term “Mainland China” instead of “The People’s Republic of China” when referring to China. I wonder who gave the ministry (or Ma for that matter) the authority to change another country’s name at its whim. (“MOFA delays ‘Taiwan” name changes,” June 6, page 1)
The ministry said its recommendation was in keeping with Ma’s stance on cross-strait relations, based on the so-called “1992 consensus,” which in my opinion is an imaginary pact based on mutual fooling.
The consensus stipulates that both sides of the Taiwan Strait uphold the “one China” principle and agree to disagree on whether Taiwan is part of the PRC or China is part of the ROC.
Thus it seems so perfect for Ma’s administration to describe the PRC as Mainland China and include the entire country as part of the ROC. How wonderful it is to “recover the mainland” by simply manipulating the names.
Ma might be able to continue to fool people in Taiwan with some feel-good schemes. But the international community needs just one official name for a country, not a variety that sidesteps the rule of law.
As US president Abraham Lincoln said: “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.”
People in Taiwan should be fooled no more. They should demand that lawmakers hold a referendum on changing the country’s name from the Republic of China to the Republic of Taiwan, or just Taiwan.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS