As a teacher who wants to protect the rights of pregnant girls and help them avoid an early end to their professional development, I applaud the Ministry of Education’s amendment of the High School Student Performance Evaluation Methods (學生成績考查法) that allows high school girls and boys to take maternity, paternity and parental leave without flunking.
But the measures are not enough. In the past five years, about 7,000 to 8,000 babies have been born in Taiwan to girls between 15 and 19 years old, but according to ministry statistics from 2006, only 153 high school or vocational school students became pregnant. This huge gap shows that most teen mothers drop out of school, and even if they can take leave, the number finishing school is very low.
We must also show why high school girls get pregnant. Is it appropriate to get pregnant at that age? Developed countries strive to lower the teenage pregnancy rate, which is also an important indicator of the efficiency of sex education.
The pregnancy rate for 15 to 19-year-old Taiwanese girls over the past five years is 11.8 percent — or just over one in every 10. This is three times higher than Japan’s rate of 4 percent, and more than four times higher than South Korea’s 2.8 percent.
Why can’t we lower the teen pregnancy rate, take action to protect girls’ sexual health and teach boys responsible sexual behavior? The most important reason is that sex education has not been properly implemented.
According to a 2004 survey by the Preparatory Office of the National Academy of Educational Research, sex education in schools is often incorporated into health education classes. However, in high school health education, only 37.7 percent of classes are taught by qualified staff, while the rest are taught by teachers of other subjects.
Health education is, in effect, a supplementary subject. This situation is reflected in the Health and Nursing classes for high schools and vocational high schools that were introduced in 2006. Basic-level teachers for these classes said that when first-year students were asked if they had received any sex education, only about half said yes, and half of these students said their teachers glossed over the use of condoms and other methods of contraception with a spoken introduction.
Sex education is not about passing on knowledge; it’s about teaching values. Sex education is not about teaching girls and boys sexual positions; it is intended to inform students on healthy relations between the sexes.
In sex education, how the subject is taught is more important than what is actually taught. A school is a place for education, and the focus should be on education, results and prevention.
Now that the ministry is allowing pregnant high school students to take various forms of leave, it should also emphasize the importance of sex education and not wait until students become pregnant before addressing their problems.
Sweden was the first country to include sex education in school curriculums. The main supporter of this policy, Elise Ottesen-Jensen, founder of the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education, said in 1937: “I dream of the day when every newborn child is welcome, when men and women are equal, and when sexuality is an expression of intimacy, joy and tenderness.”
Compared with other Asian countries, Taiwan has the advantage of teaching sex education from elementary school to the second year of high school. If it can strengthen the professionalism of teachers and continue reforms that improve sex education, then it will be able to better protect students’ rights and be a model for the development of sex education in the region.
Kao Sung-ching is president of the Taiwan Association for Sex Education.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS