Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) Minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏) unveiled his policies to the media on May 19. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) also vowed to make all policies environmentally friendly at the opening ceremony of an annual NGO environmental conference on May 31.
After two weeks in power, the government leaders’ emphasis on domestic environmental protection is praiseworthy. Still, I have a few suggestions.
Shen said that, in the first six months of the administration, the EPA would push for 12 pieces of legislation, including an energy tax act, a greenhouse gas reduction act and a renewable energy development act.
However, the energy tax act and the renewable energy development act lie beyond the EPA’s authority. Because of the distribution of authority and responsibilities, the EPA is not likely to be able to push for these bills as it wishes without taking into consideration the position of the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
The 12 suggested drafts will merely be of symbolic value unless the different ministries can reach a consensus soon.
Passing the greenhouse gas reduction act would not be difficult given the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) legislative majority. However, the necessary legal framework for the proposed reduction act, which aims to set a time limit on reductions, is lacking. It should therefore be withdrawn and redrafted.
Furthermore, Shen has indicated that the future focus of policy will be on replacing orders and controls with economic incentives. However, any sort of economic incentive should be based on investigation into and understanding of pollution. Economic incentives are fine, but when regulations are broken and the environment is damaged, appropriate legal action should be taken.
Therefore, economic incentives cannot just be replaced by regulations; instead, economic incentives should be used to supplement regulations.
Shen should not overestimate the effects of economic incentives. Fees that are charged for air pollution control and recycling, clearance and treatment are all economic tools based on price restrictions. However, despite the hundreds of millions of NT dollars in fees levied each year, we have never been informed what tangible benefits these economic tools have for our environment.
Shen also stated that the debate surrounding the Suhua Freeway is not about the road itself, but more about the changes in the type of development Hualien will experience after it is completed. However, the debate should not merely be about whether the freeway will have a large impact on the environment, but also whether an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) should have been carried out when the idea was first proposed.
Ma’s environmentally friendly policies are not new and the correct term for such policies is Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). The Treaty of Maastricht, for example, states that the formulation and execution of all EU policies must be based on the principle of environmental protection.
A similar principle is mentioned in Article 26 of Taiwan’s Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法) that requires EIAs on policies that may affect the environment.
However, the evaluation of the SEA system is only an internal evaluation carried out by the government and at times involves the Cabinet examining and approving its own policies. Thus, all of Taiwan’s SEAs since 2000 have been flawed.
For Ma’s environmentally friendly policies to work, the legally binding power of SEAs must be strengthened.
Wang Yu-cheng is an assistant professor of law at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND DREW CAMERON
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s