Following the election of South Korean President Lee Myung-bak in December, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) pointed to South Korea as an illustration of how the nation should mold its future to ensure a prosperous economy.
Ma blamed the Democratic Progressive Party government for the sluggish growth in average income and GDP, while seeking to compare himself to Lee. He mimicked Lee’s “7-4-7” policy by proposing a “6-3-3” economic policy, promising to achieve 6 percent economic growth, 3 percent unemployment and 3 percent inflation.
To bolster economic growth, Ma proposed the “i-Taiwan” 12 infrastructure projects, which he said would jump-start the economy by pouring NT$2.65 trillion (US$87.3 billion) in government funds into domestic development over an eight-year period.
In addition to repeatedly citing South Korea as his model for Taiwan, Ma told voters that the government should not only focus on achieving a healthier economy, but also on improving the living standard and wellbeing of the average person. The KMT aired a TV commercial featuring a South Korean businessman insulting Taiwan’s economy by calling it weak in comparison with South Korea’s and claiming that Ma was the cure to Taiwan’s economic woes.
The campaign to portray Ma as another Lee was highly successful. But since being elected, Ma has shown less interest in comparing himself to South Korea’s president and discussing his 6-3-3 policy to improve people’s lives. His administration is now facing the reality of soaring oil and commodity prices that Ma’s campaign team knew all along would be a factor even as it painted a very different picture to the public.
Now his administration has announced a series of hikes in commodities, but without complementary measures to attenuate the impact on the average household.
In a symbolic gesture of his concern, Lee pledged in March to donate his entire salary during his five-year term to help those saddled with poverty in his country. More significantly, Lee’s government has since announced a plan to alleviate the financial burden of rising oil and food prices with tax rebates that would benefit some 13.8 million South Koreans. In addition, the South Korean government is planning to pay out 10 trillion won (US$9.7 billion) to cover the heating bills of 860,000 low-income families.
Seoul is attempting to mitigate the problems faced by underprivileged families, while seeking to maintain consumption levels with tax rebates. South Korea is not the only country seeking ways to help vulnerable people as commodity prices look set to continue increasing. In Asia, Singapore is offering US$1.32 billion in funds to address the matter, while Hong Kong is considering similar measures.
Ma and his administration must follow suit if they hope to attain the goals they pledged to pursue and curb the impact of price hikes on the public. Ma is fond of saying that a compassionate and responsible government feels the pain of its people. His words will mean little if he does not act now to show his concern for those hit hardest by rising commodity and energy prices.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS