SINCE President Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) inauguration, various government agencies have been working to promote the common market between Taiwan and China that Ma proposed during his election campaign. They are looking forward to an influx of students, low-skilled workers, technical personnel and other Chinese showing up on Taiwan’s campuses and in its job markets soon.
Taking Singapore — which is often cited as a model by Taiwan’s new government — as an example, we find that Singapore’s foreign workers can be divided into three groups. The first group consists of laborers from nearby, less developed countries like Indonesia or Thailand. They mostly earn between NT$5,000 and NT$7,000 per month doing physical labor.
The second group consists of mid-level technical personnel, with a monthly salary of about NT$20,000. A majority of them come from China. Research has shown that Singapore Airlines recruits a large number of its personnel from China to lower its operating costs, with about 80 percent of its flight attendants coming from China and the remaining 20 percent from Singapore.
The third group is composed of highly skilled scientific personnel. In the past, these workers were mostly from Hong Kong or India, but as the number of Chinese graduates from foreign universities increased, Singapore also opened more opportunities for them to stay and work. These data are from 2006; if extrapolated to this year the numbers would probably be even higher.
If the number of low or high-level workers or foreign students were to rise further, the Singaporean job market would be the first to be affected. Their expanding number could influence the lot of the working poor, who run a high risk of losing their jobs because they are easier to replace.
These consequences are reflected in the gap between rich and poor. Data provided by the World Bank shows that Singapore’s wealth gap has increased: In 1982, the income of the richest 20 percent of households in Singapore was 9.6 times as high as that of the poorest 20 percent; this figure rose to 20.9 times in 2000 and 31.9 times in 2005. The number for Taiwan in 2005 was 6.01. This does not just make Singapore the worst of the Asian Tigers in this respect — such a large wealth gap also makes it seem like a third world country.
Despite Singapore’s high household income, more than 20 percent of Singaporeans have a monthly income of less than NT$20,000. A research report published by Statistics Singapore also shows that about 280,000 households, or about 27.4 percent of all households, have a monthly income of no more than NT$40,000. Clearly, the Singaporean economy has benefited from importing labor but a lot of people have been left out in the cold, stuck in a situation where income is going down while prices go up.
From Singapore’s economy we can see the consequences of a future of closer relationships with China. Only a small number of capitalists will profit, while a large number of workers will suffer. The Mainland Affairs Council and the Ministry of Education are working together on a plan to recognize diplomas from Chinese universities and arrange for Chinese students to study in Taiwanese universities. I earnestly call on the new government to take into account the negative consequences this policy could bring, such as unemployment, poverty and social polarization, and to avoid implementing bad policies that would harm the Taiwanese public.
Liou You-shine is a doctoral student in the Institute for Labor Research at National Chengchi University and a member of the Youth Labor Union 95.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
Singaporean correction
Liou You-shine’s (劉侑學) article (“Singapore reflects the pitfalls of China ties,” June 10, page 8) gave inaccurate information about Singapore Airlines. I would like to clear up a few points.
Singapore Airlines currently has 7,000 crewmembers, of whom 60 percent are female and 40 percent are male. Eighty-five percent of female employees are from Singapore and Malaysia, while the other 15 percent are from Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, Indonesia, India, Japan and South Korea.
Singapore Airlines employs foreign crewmembers to offer better service to travelers from different parts of the world. We do not employ foreign staff to cut costs. Singapore Airlines pays special attention to the specific needs of each individual traveler. For example, on flights to Taiwan, two crewmembers from Taiwan are on board to serve Taiwanese travelers and offer a flight experience customers keep coming back for.
Wu Pei-nan
Public relations manager
Singapore Airlines
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS