Less than three weeks after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration took office, the first official to defy a government ban and challenge the Cabinet is not a Democratic Progressive Party county commissioner or mayor, but Kinmen County Commissioner Lee Chu-feng (李炷烽), of the pan-blue New Party.
Lee openly defied the law that says county commissioners and mayors who want to visit China must first get approval from the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). He also signed an agreement to import water from China, thereby violating the Act Governing Relations Between Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸關係條例), which bars agreements with China without government authorization.
To make matters worse, when the council warned Lee to stop, Lee insulted council Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛). Nevertheless, the Cabinet set a precedent by allowing Lee to visit China in his capacity as advisor to Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor, in spite of his flagrant breach of the law and defiance of Taipei. When pressured to apologize, Lee said he thought that Lai did not have a full understanding of the situation, the council remains the main institution for cross-strait policy.
Cross-strait relations have been changing quickly since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office. The ban on Taiwanese officials visiting China may be changed, but until that happens the Cabinet should uphold the law. Yet neither the Presidential Office, the Cabinet or any government official have said a word in defense of Lai.
Before showing China goodwill, the government should demand its own officials be shown respect. No government should tolerate behavior as arrogant as Lee’s.
However, not only has the government not defended Lai, it appears that the MAC only agreed that Lee could visit China after it was pressured to do so by Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄). Such reports simply reinforce the image of Lai — a former Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) legislator close to former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — as an outsider and a token political sop to non-KMT supporters.
Even if it were government policy to let mayors and county commissioners travel to China, would the implementation of that policy really require humiliating Lai? Ever since her appointment, Lai has been treated with contempt by the pan-blue camp. If this is representative of the government’s “hospitality,” one can only wonder why anyone from outside the pan-blue camp would consider joining the Cabinet.
The humiliation of Lai has nothing to do with Lee Teng-hui or the TSU, and everything to do with the overall attitude of Ma’s government. It is this attitude that allows Lee Chu-feng to behave as he does.
After this week’s talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait, more mayors and county commissioners will probably want to visit China. The MAC is the only remaining barrier stopping an all-out stampede across the Strait. If the Ma administration cannot guarantee the council’s authority and the dignity of its officials, its China policies will descend into chaos.
If Ma loses control of cross-strait exchanges, he will not be able to protect Taiwan’s sovereignty and dignity at the negotiating table, either from Beijing or from the self-serving politicians who are so willing to trade away their fellow citizens’ rights for personal aggrandizement.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS