Less than three weeks after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration took office, the first official to defy a government ban and challenge the Cabinet is not a Democratic Progressive Party county commissioner or mayor, but Kinmen County Commissioner Lee Chu-feng (李炷烽), of the pan-blue New Party.
Lee openly defied the law that says county commissioners and mayors who want to visit China must first get approval from the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). He also signed an agreement to import water from China, thereby violating the Act Governing Relations Between Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸關係條例), which bars agreements with China without government authorization.
To make matters worse, when the council warned Lee to stop, Lee insulted council Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛). Nevertheless, the Cabinet set a precedent by allowing Lee to visit China in his capacity as advisor to Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor, in spite of his flagrant breach of the law and defiance of Taipei. When pressured to apologize, Lee said he thought that Lai did not have a full understanding of the situation, the council remains the main institution for cross-strait policy.
Cross-strait relations have been changing quickly since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office. The ban on Taiwanese officials visiting China may be changed, but until that happens the Cabinet should uphold the law. Yet neither the Presidential Office, the Cabinet or any government official have said a word in defense of Lai.
Before showing China goodwill, the government should demand its own officials be shown respect. No government should tolerate behavior as arrogant as Lee’s.
However, not only has the government not defended Lai, it appears that the MAC only agreed that Lee could visit China after it was pressured to do so by Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄). Such reports simply reinforce the image of Lai — a former Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) legislator close to former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — as an outsider and a token political sop to non-KMT supporters.
Even if it were government policy to let mayors and county commissioners travel to China, would the implementation of that policy really require humiliating Lai? Ever since her appointment, Lai has been treated with contempt by the pan-blue camp. If this is representative of the government’s “hospitality,” one can only wonder why anyone from outside the pan-blue camp would consider joining the Cabinet.
The humiliation of Lai has nothing to do with Lee Teng-hui or the TSU, and everything to do with the overall attitude of Ma’s government. It is this attitude that allows Lee Chu-feng to behave as he does.
After this week’s talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait, more mayors and county commissioners will probably want to visit China. The MAC is the only remaining barrier stopping an all-out stampede across the Strait. If the Ma administration cannot guarantee the council’s authority and the dignity of its officials, its China policies will descend into chaos.
If Ma loses control of cross-strait exchanges, he will not be able to protect Taiwan’s sovereignty and dignity at the negotiating table, either from Beijing or from the self-serving politicians who are so willing to trade away their fellow citizens’ rights for personal aggrandizement.
There will be a new presidential administration in the United States in January 2025. It will be important for the Lai (賴清德) administration and America’s next administration to get on the same page quickly and visibly in respective efforts to bolster Taiwan’s security, economic vitality, and dignity and respect on the world stage. One key measure for doing so will be whether Washington and Taipei can coalesce around a common narrative for moving US-Taiwan relations forward. In recent years, Washington and Taipei have leaned into fear as a motivator for coordinated action. For a time, both sides publicly reinforced each other’s
Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5. I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US. The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump. He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so. “Trump believes
Embroiled in multiple scandals, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday announced that he would apply for a three-month leave of absence from his role as party leader, creating uncertainty about the future of the TPP and the “new politics” that he had promised to bring. Shortly after his announcement, Ko’s home and office were searched and he was questioned by prosecutors over his suspected involvement in a corruption case related to a real-estate development project. He was arrested early Saturday morning after he refused to be questioned at night and attempted to leave the prosecutors’ office. In
The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there. Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters. The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in