There comes a time in every man’s life when he has an identity crisis. This usually takes the form of: Who am I? Am I successful enough? Why am I not dating someone my daughter’s age?
When I was 40, I was too busy subverting the state and evading the last of the White Terror hitmen to wallow in self-indulgent, panicky pseudo-introspection (which, as it happens, will be the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) occupation for at least the next four years).
It may be too late for me, but it would seem my country is in the throes of its own identity crisis.
All the signs are there. It’s developed a major economic inferiority complex — despite perfectly respectable growth figures — and is swapping its values for new, more materialistic ones.
Thus, “cross-strait win-win situation” is replacing “Taiwanese consciousness” as the buzzword — or buzzmouthful (just when I was getting the hang of calling state companies, the international airport and the Memorialissimo by their new names).
Soon my beloved island nation will be going through a hedonistic cycle of one-night stands with hundreds of Chinese tourists per day. But, I ask, will it find the economic security it seeks?
As with any such crisis, some fear that there is a risk Taiwan will get in over its head and lose control (the equivalent of taking out a second mortgage on your home to buy your dream Ferrari, getting in a life-threatening wreck and losing both the car and the home to pay the medical bills).
Why worry? With the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), we’re in capable hands. First, there’s the Cabinet. Packed with time-tested experts and technocrats, they say.
Take Minister of National Defense Chen Chao-min (陳肇敏), who looks set to spend much of his time defending himself instead of the country.
Chen told legislators that the March 19, 2004, shooting of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and not-so-trusty sidekick Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) never took place.
Then, in the face of criticism (and a lawsuit), the defense minister did what any fearless former KMT military leader would do — “Retreat!!” — and offered what I’ve dubbed an “apolitology” to the effect of “Sorry for any trouble my entirely truthful comments made.”
Then, in a brilliant second act, he made what the French might call a gaffe extraordinaire. The one-time Air Force commander-in-chief nonplussed the legislature’s Diplomacy and National Defense Committee by insisting that there is no military airport in Taoyuan County. The snag: there is, actually.
Yes, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is leading us into a brave, new world — a world in which ministers aren’t troubled by the requirements of their jobs.
Very postmodern.
Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) simply followed suit last week when she said she would consider abolishing capital punishment — but also that she had no idea how.
On the China front, meanwhile, the KMT is making leaps and bounds. Party Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) headed to Nanjing this week for the first direct meeting between the Chicoms and KMT heads since the Chinese Civil War.
Good thing they sent Wu. If the Chicoms kidnap him and demand Taiwan’s capitulation, at least he’s dispensable — unlike this country’s most famous hostage, Chiang “Whose tomb is it anyway” Kai-shek(蔣介石).
The Nanjing meeting marks a big change for the KMT. With Ma in office, the KMT’s closed-door talks with the Chicoms no longer constitute treason. Kinda takes all the conniving fun out of it, huh?
So maybe it was sheer boredom that prompted Wu to make a remark I can only interpret as facetious: the fact that Beijing would meet the KMT despite the aftermath of the Sichuan earthquake shows just how seriously China takes cross-strait relations.
Funny, I thought the 1,000-odd missiles pointed our way were a pretty clear sign.
But now’s not the time for talk of brutish threats. The word “goodwill” has flown back and forth across the Strait so many times in the past few weeks we could start booking tourist groups on it.
In fact, that might not be a bad idea, because after months of hearing Ma’s 3,000-Chinese-tourists-a-day mantra, last week Beijing proposed only 18 cross-strait flights per week. That’s a grand total of 1,000, not 21,000, tourists per week.
Ma must be crestfallen. Is Beijing out to embarrass him or what? He’s offered so many olive branches in the past two weeks alone that the hills of Spain have been stripped bare.
Ma’s administration removed the Chinese word for “Taiwan” from the Web site of the Presidential Office at lightning speed and is about to do the same to our stamps. Pretty Boy’s representatives to China even refer to him as “Mr Ma” instead of “Mr President” to avoid offending Beijing.
Yet China can’t even spare a lousy 3,000 tourists a day? So much for reciprocity.
Ma must be wondering if his efforts are worth the concern that he lied when he promised to stand up for Taiwanese sovereignty.
But, hey, the best of governments do occasionally lie.
Even the Taipei City Government is a full-on propaganda machine, as you’ll see from its Web site:
“Taipei’s public toilets are neither dirty nor smelly, and the flowers and greenery that adorn them make going to the toilet enjoyable.”
I kind of like all the lying. Picking the truth from the untruth is like playing a Taiwanese version of Where’s Waldo.
And what about this week’s statistics from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, which bumped up our GDP forecast for the year?
The problem is that the GDP is calculated to include generous spending by those mythical 21,000 Chinese tourists per week — even though the government has retracted that figure in other statements.
Surprised? It’s all spin — even among nominally unbiased agencies. No harm in impressing the new boss with padded numbers, right?
These are no doubt the same people who were spinning in Chen’s favor — or, perhaps, for Chen’s favors — just weeks ago, but remember: Necessity is the mother of political affiliation. Besides, pan-blue, pan-green … what’s the difference? That overly simplistic divide doesn’t really address the complex identities of our civil servants, politicians and electorate. We need a few nuances to reflect political realities.
So I will leave you today with some humble suggestions on how to identify underlying political forces.
The “Blue in Green” camp: Like a Miles Davis song, this growing bloc knows how to swing. Non-issues like national sovereignty just take the focus off the real matter at hand: who is willing to pay the most for your vote. They contend that anti-vote-buying campaigns are just a KMT-DPP conspiracy to get out of subsidizing your vote. Not gonna work, say the bluegreens: Money makes the world go round, not politics.
The Soylent Greens: Their dystopian vision of the nation’s future fuels a terror-induced passion that renders them dysfunctional at election time, capable only of wandering in the streets, foaming at the mouth and hoping disgraced former KMT Legislator Alex Fai (費鴻泰) will ride by in a police car so they can fling themselves on top of it.
Lean, green fighting machines: These guys are so green that they hate the DPP and everyone in it. Of course, they’re still members.
Besserwisser blues: They may not know anything about market mechanisms, but they know what’s best for Taiwan: the KMT. The rationale is simple. The average level of education in Taipei, where people vote blue, is higher than the south, where people vote green. Ergo, only ignorant country bumpkins vote green.
Big business blues (aka The Big Sleaze): If time isn’t money, politics sure is. They’ve been waiting for this day, and with Ma finally in the cockpit, they can see the Promised Land opening across the Strait. Ma may be president, but there’s still room for a corporate puppetmaster.
The (Cry)baby blue camp: These chaps vote for the KMT with whole-hearted devotion time and again, then whine each time they get screwed in return. Sound strange? Just ask 90 percent of the nation’s Aborigines.
The royal blues: The heyday of the KMT has passed and it’s all democracy’s fault. The solution? Install Ma as emperor and his Cabinet as eunuchs and advisers to the Court. Because it fulfills this cabal’s dynastic dreams, millions of Falun Gong across China will be incited to rise up and crush the Chicoms, before being swept aside to allow Ma to occupy the throne of the New Tang Dynasty.
Throw in Lien Chan (連戰) and heir apparent Sean Lien (連勝文) as court jesters and that’s a national vision even I would support.
Got something to tell Johnny? Go on, get it off your chest. Write to dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com, but be sure to put “Dear Johnny” in the subject line or he’ll mark your bouquets and brickbats as spam.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS