By Vaclav Havel, Desmond Tutu, Richard von Weizsacker, Karel Schwarzenberg, Andre Glucksmann, F.W. de Klerk, Mike Moore and Grigory Yavlinsky
The enormous suffering of the Burmese caused by the recent cyclone, which has caused tens of thousands of deaths, deserves the sympathy of the entire world. But more than sympathy is needed, because the Myanmar military junta’s incompetence and brutal oppression are further aggravating the tragic consequences of this natural disaster.
In the midst of the cyclone’s devastation, Myanmar’s ruling generals went ahead and held a referendum on a new constitution. But, according to Myanmar’s Constitutional Referendum Act, members of religious organizations, those subject to criminal prosecution and members of ethnic groups that have not agreed to a ceasefire with the government were barred from voting.
Thus, all current and former political prisoners, about 500,000 Buddhist monks, and more than twice as many members of ethnic minority groups living close to the borders were banned from the vote.
Moreover, according to the new constitution that was supposedly “approved” by the “referendum,” Aung San Suu Kyi, who has never been prosecuted and still remains under house arrest, is barred from standing in the 2010 general elections under the pretext that her deceased husband was British.
Is the world really willing to accept such an absurdity?
We strongly support the opposition’s campaign calling on Myanmar’s citizens to reject the constitution, which does not promote human rights, but only confirms the military’s political role. Many democracy activists have been arrested throughout the country.
The regime’s draconian “law” prohibits participants from criticizing the draft constitution; those who dare to challenge the regime face a 20-year prison sentence.
Given the violent suppression of last September’s mass demonstrations (the “Saffron Revolution”) led by Myanmar’s Buddhist monks and the constant repression in the country, it is not surprising that the military junta tries to shroud its despotic tendencies in pseudo-democratic measures such as the sham electoral process of the referendum.
Sadly, the international community did not respond to last autumn’s mass arrests of human rights defenders.
The 88 Generation leaders, including Min Ko Naing, Ko Ko Gyi, women activists like Su Su Nway, and others bravely expressed their grievances time and again in letters, statements and public demonstrations prior to the Saffron Revolution.
Their courageous calls fell on deaf ears; they now remain imprisoned.
It is time to strongly condemn the exclusion of a considerable number of people from voting and to insist on the release of Myanmar’s political prisoners. The UN and the EU should be ready to conclusively reject the result of the referendum and strengthen sanctions against the regime.
Myanmar’s neighbors in ASEAN should stop looking the other way as Myanmar’s rulers trample on the Burmese.
The UN Security Council should consider introducing a universal arms embargo and the EU should adopt banking sanctions that target the regime and its cronies.
Moreover, the UN should not only condemn, but without further delay put a stop to today’s greatest atrocity: the regime’s obstruction of foreign assistance to victims of the cyclone.
Their deaths are the sole responsibility of the military junta, which deliberately and with knowledge of the likely consequences has closed the door to humanitarian aid and workers from all over the world. Their actions represent an appalling crime against humanity.
The military-run referendum will not bring democracy to Myanmar, nor will it help the Burmese, who now are suffering not only from the authoritarian regime and poverty, but also from a grave natural disaster and its totally inept handling by the cynical generals. Myanmar’s rulers have failed in their duty to protect the Burmese, but active and decisive political action by the international community towards the regime may yet do so.
Vaclav Havel is a former president of the Czech Republic, Desmond Tutu is a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Richard von Weizsacker is a former president of Germany, Karel Schwarzenberg is foreign minister of the Czech Republic, Andre Glucksmann is a French philosopher, F.W. de Klerk is a former president of South Africa, Mike Moore is a former director of the WTO and Grigory Yavlinsky is leader of the Yabloko party in Russia.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS