From the moment the earthquake shook China's Sichuan Province and surrounding areas on May 12, everyone was glued to their TV sets.
We saw the camera zoom in as a survivor was carefully dragged out, legs caught under the debris. On the count of three, a concrete slab was lifted up, and we were happy and relieved to see signs of life as the victim finally emerged from the rubble.
Every day we see glimpses of miraculous rescues on TV. But we know that they are exceptional and that the situation is many times worse than we can imagine. We know that for the one survivor we see on TV there were thousands who couldn’t be saved.
We know the glimpses we see on TV are edited to be as dramatic as possible, but that’s how we want it: to see that people are still alive and breathing after having been buried for eight or nine days, and then hear a badly wounded person who had been buried under tonnes of concrete telling his or her family in a trembling voice how much he loved them.
The good news keeps coming; the most common reports are about happy reunions. Someone kowtowed to members of a search and rescue team because they had rescued his son. Someone else ran into lost family members in a temporary refugee camp.
On another occasion, the family of a little girl recognized her when she was being comforted by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) on live TV. And there was also the pregnant woman who was pulled out from under the rubble; miraculously, both mother and child were fine.
We know that we are witnessing miracles, but we need those miracles, because we are the rescue dogs sniffing the ground, looking for signs of life, no matter how faint.
The most touching of these news reports was about a mother who left a message on a mobile phone, telling her child: “Honey, remember that I love you.”
The most moving report showed a couple discussing their wedding to make sure that the fiancee, who was buried under ruins, held on to life as the man repeatedly asked her if she wanted a Western-style or traditional Chinese wedding.
TV audiences are equally singleminded; it is as if we are thinking that as long as we keep our TV sets on, the broken-hearted digging mother will manage to dig a hole right down to her child to bring it air — almost as if we were helping her dig.
What are we waiting for? Sitting in front of our TV sets, we pick up a bit of the local language. They call their children wawa, and we wonder how many wawa remain buried under the rubble and how many parents are still looking for their wawa.
In terrible times, TV viewers need this kind of persistence: watching television in marathon sessions, sitting in their houses far from the scene of the disaster and full of guilt for being survivors.
They also need to see sad and happy news to feel that they are personally involved. On screen, there is waiting, suspense, surprise and virtuous heroes: the People’s Liberation Army soldiers sacrificing themselves to save others, fighting to the last man, and never giving up as long as there is a glimmer of hope.
This almost frightening willpower helps them overcome the curse of the crucial first 72 hours and continue to rescue people.
China is relying on old methods and unbending determination: The combined determination of hundreds of millions of people can achieve anything. On screen, no one questions the effectiveness of the rescue operations, not even whether there is probe equipment at the disaster area, navigation systems, large-scale machinery or even how the rescue materials should be allocated.
Precisely because effectiveness is not an issue, the search and rescue team from Taiwan could not be put to work, as there weren’t maps indicating which parts of the disaster area had been reached by other teams.
Since the earthquake, foreign television stations have used images from CCTV, China’s national television station, and followed that station’s lead in sending out a stream of positive stories, for at this moment the people need security, not disorderly talk that serves to confuse them.
Two weeks have passed since the earthquake. What lies ahead is reconstruction of the disaster area, which is an even more difficult task, for at any moment dams and dikes may break, disease can break out, or landslides might recur.
In China’s vast territory, it seems as if the nation can still rely on the enormous collective willpower of its citizenry.
If it wasn’t for the feeling of direction derived from the continuous flow of news, if it wasn’t for the calls for mobilization that tapped popular feeling, then who would have dug out survivors and bodies, and who eventually will help with reconstruction?
Ping Lu is the director of the Kwang Hwa Information and Culture Center in Hong Kong.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS