The scandal had all the makings of a tabloid blockbuster: A soap opera actor accused his wife, another popular television star, of infidelity with his close friend and an Italian chef who was giving her private cooking lessons.
The actor, Park Chul, pressed charges against his wife, Ok So-ri, and the two men under South Korea’s adultery law, which prohibits extramaritaal affairs and can land those found guilty in prison for up to two years.
Then the 39-year-old Ok took the drama a step further. She admitted to having an affair (with the friend, not the chef). And she filed a petition in court, challenging the constitutionality of the 55-year-old adultery statute.
With that move, she turned a messy marital struggle into a public battle over the country’s changing mores.
Like many countries, South Korea has long been troubled by contradictions over sex outside marriage. Until this century, women faced ostracism — shunned even by their birth families — if they cheated on their husbands, but men, especially wealthy ones, were allowed to keep concubines.
Now, even as some hold to fairly puritanical standards — sex education in schools is still discouraged — the country’s strict social code seems to be weakening somewhat. Divorce is becoming more common, and so-called love motels, which cater to guests having illicit sex, are opening throughout the country.
Those who support the adultery law see it as the last bulwark against the “free-sex culture of the West,” while opponents call it an anachronism.
“The state meddling in which sex partner we should have — that’s too much,” Lim Sung-bin, Ok’s lawyer, said this month after a three-hour hearing at the Constitutional Court, where his client did not appear. “Such a time is gone.”
The nine-member court said it would rule on the case soon. It is deliberating Ok’s suit, along with three other petitions against the adultery law, all filed in the past year.
South Korea is among a dwindling number of non-Muslim countries where an adultery conviction can earn a jail sentence. About 70 percent of South Koreans support the adultery law, according to surveys conducted in recent years by the government and the news media.
Each year, more than 1,200 people are indicted under the law, and about half are convicted.
“Some argue that no law should intrude beneath the quilt,” said Han Sang-dae, a Justice Ministry official who defended the law during the Constitutional Court hearing. “But if we allow freedom for extramarital affairs, it will threaten our sexual morality as well as monogamy, a foundation of our society.”
The Constitutional Court has ruled three times in favor of the adultery law, the last time in 2001.
The challenge also comes as the law is losing some of its staunchest backers. Two long-standing champions of women’s rights and the adultery law — the Korean Women’s Association United and the Ministry of Gender Equality — say it is time for South Korea to consider abolishing it.
Women’s groups had been some of the strongest supporters of criminalizing adultery. In the past, most adultery suits were filed by wives against husbands; the law gave them leverage in a society where women had little recourse against their husbands’ infidelity.
With their economic and legal status rising, many women no longer fear divorce or feel that they need a law to help them deal with a cheating husband. And with a growing number of men applying the law against their wives, women are questioning whether the protections it offers are worth the risks.
“Adultery was once considered something only husbands could do,” said Kwak Bae-hee, president of the Korea Legal Aid Center for Family Relations, a nongovernmental agency. “But now women think they can do it too, and some of them actually do it.”
Park filed divorce and adultery lawsuits last October, saying he had evidence that his wife had engaged in extramarital affairs with an Italian chef in a Seoul hotel and with an opera singer who was a friend of Park’s.
In a highly unusual move for a South Korean woman embroiled in a sex scandal, Ok called a news conference to defend herself. After confirming her relationship with her husband’s friend, she explained in shocking detail why she had had an affair.
“I had a very lonely and unsatisfied marriage because of a loveless husband,” Ok said, fighting back tears. “We only had sex 10 times in our 11 years of marriage.”
Park told a news conference that he felt like “an innocent pedestrian hit by a car ... Ninety-eight percent of what she said was either distorted or wrong.”
The case against Ok was suspended while the Constitutional Court deliberated the law.
Many of those who oppose the adultery law say it is so difficult to build a criminal case that the law is impractical. A conviction requires proof of sexual intercourse, leading some spouses who believe they have been wronged to raid motel rooms, accompanied by police officers.
However, only 47 people of those convicted of adultery last year ended up behind bars.
Some experts also find it absurd that South Korea criminalizes adultery while there is no law against incest. Still, many think it is too early to rescind the adultery law. In a country where many women silently suffer their husbands’ infidelity out of fear that a divorce could leave them impoverished, adultery charges remain a potent tool to secure a better financial settlement or child custody, Kwak said. Although divorce laws have become more equitable, the men usually receive most of the family’s wealth.
Ha Ji-eun, a student at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, said she believed that the law still offered important protections.
“Korean men, many of them, still get away with adultery because women are weak,” Ha said. “It was as recently as during my grandparents’ days that men brought in concubines and kicked out their wives. If this law is abolished, I am sure women will suffer more.”
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS