The scandal had all the makings of a tabloid blockbuster: A soap opera actor accused his wife, another popular television star, of infidelity with his close friend and an Italian chef who was giving her private cooking lessons.
The actor, Park Chul, pressed charges against his wife, Ok So-ri, and the two men under South Korea’s adultery law, which prohibits extramaritaal affairs and can land those found guilty in prison for up to two years.
Then the 39-year-old Ok took the drama a step further. She admitted to having an affair (with the friend, not the chef). And she filed a petition in court, challenging the constitutionality of the 55-year-old adultery statute.
With that move, she turned a messy marital struggle into a public battle over the country’s changing mores.
Like many countries, South Korea has long been troubled by contradictions over sex outside marriage. Until this century, women faced ostracism — shunned even by their birth families — if they cheated on their husbands, but men, especially wealthy ones, were allowed to keep concubines.
Now, even as some hold to fairly puritanical standards — sex education in schools is still discouraged — the country’s strict social code seems to be weakening somewhat. Divorce is becoming more common, and so-called love motels, which cater to guests having illicit sex, are opening throughout the country.
Those who support the adultery law see it as the last bulwark against the “free-sex culture of the West,” while opponents call it an anachronism.
“The state meddling in which sex partner we should have — that’s too much,” Lim Sung-bin, Ok’s lawyer, said this month after a three-hour hearing at the Constitutional Court, where his client did not appear. “Such a time is gone.”
The nine-member court said it would rule on the case soon. It is deliberating Ok’s suit, along with three other petitions against the adultery law, all filed in the past year.
South Korea is among a dwindling number of non-Muslim countries where an adultery conviction can earn a jail sentence. About 70 percent of South Koreans support the adultery law, according to surveys conducted in recent years by the government and the news media.
Each year, more than 1,200 people are indicted under the law, and about half are convicted.
“Some argue that no law should intrude beneath the quilt,” said Han Sang-dae, a Justice Ministry official who defended the law during the Constitutional Court hearing. “But if we allow freedom for extramarital affairs, it will threaten our sexual morality as well as monogamy, a foundation of our society.”
The Constitutional Court has ruled three times in favor of the adultery law, the last time in 2001.
The challenge also comes as the law is losing some of its staunchest backers. Two long-standing champions of women’s rights and the adultery law — the Korean Women’s Association United and the Ministry of Gender Equality — say it is time for South Korea to consider abolishing it.
Women’s groups had been some of the strongest supporters of criminalizing adultery. In the past, most adultery suits were filed by wives against husbands; the law gave them leverage in a society where women had little recourse against their husbands’ infidelity.
With their economic and legal status rising, many women no longer fear divorce or feel that they need a law to help them deal with a cheating husband. And with a growing number of men applying the law against their wives, women are questioning whether the protections it offers are worth the risks.
“Adultery was once considered something only husbands could do,” said Kwak Bae-hee, president of the Korea Legal Aid Center for Family Relations, a nongovernmental agency. “But now women think they can do it too, and some of them actually do it.”
Park filed divorce and adultery lawsuits last October, saying he had evidence that his wife had engaged in extramarital affairs with an Italian chef in a Seoul hotel and with an opera singer who was a friend of Park’s.
In a highly unusual move for a South Korean woman embroiled in a sex scandal, Ok called a news conference to defend herself. After confirming her relationship with her husband’s friend, she explained in shocking detail why she had had an affair.
“I had a very lonely and unsatisfied marriage because of a loveless husband,” Ok said, fighting back tears. “We only had sex 10 times in our 11 years of marriage.”
Park told a news conference that he felt like “an innocent pedestrian hit by a car ... Ninety-eight percent of what she said was either distorted or wrong.”
The case against Ok was suspended while the Constitutional Court deliberated the law.
Many of those who oppose the adultery law say it is so difficult to build a criminal case that the law is impractical. A conviction requires proof of sexual intercourse, leading some spouses who believe they have been wronged to raid motel rooms, accompanied by police officers.
However, only 47 people of those convicted of adultery last year ended up behind bars.
Some experts also find it absurd that South Korea criminalizes adultery while there is no law against incest. Still, many think it is too early to rescind the adultery law. In a country where many women silently suffer their husbands’ infidelity out of fear that a divorce could leave them impoverished, adultery charges remain a potent tool to secure a better financial settlement or child custody, Kwak said. Although divorce laws have become more equitable, the men usually receive most of the family’s wealth.
Ha Ji-eun, a student at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, said she believed that the law still offered important protections.
“Korean men, many of them, still get away with adultery because women are weak,” Ha said. “It was as recently as during my grandparents’ days that men brought in concubines and kicked out their wives. If this law is abolished, I am sure women will suffer more.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS