The UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf has set a deadline of May 12 next year for claims submissions, and signatory nations to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea have been quickening their pace in enacting related laws.
The Philippines is no exception, and both houses of Congress have proposed bills to incorporate the Spratly Islands and the Scarborough Shoal, the only visible part of the Macclesfield Bank, into Philippine territory, which would result in a redrawing of its continental shelf boundary lines. These actions are worthy of our attention.
On Dec. 13 last year, the Philippine House of Representatives passed House Bill 3216, which redefines the baseline of Philippine territory, on second reading. However, the Commission on Maritime and Ocean Affairs, an office under the Office of the President, expressed reservations about the bill because it incorporated the Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands into the Philippine archipelagic baseline. This could spark regional tensions and harm cooperation with China.
The Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs sent the baseline bill back to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs for another review. The department seeks to designate the Spratlys, referred to as the Kalayaan Islands by the Philippines, as a “regime of islands” rather than enclosing them within the national baseline.
In other words, the department’s baseline would be determined separately from the Philippine archipelago.
The Philippines is also planning to expand the limits of its continental shelf from 200 nautical miles (370km) to 350 nautical miles, supposedly to gain access to the Spratlys’ natural resources and oil.
The HB 3216 baseline bill defines at least six territories, including the Spratlys and Scarborough Shoal, which do not belong to the Philippines, as lying within the national baseline. It would be difficult under international law for this claim to be recognized.
Senator Antonio Trillanes advocates connecting the Scarborough Shoal with the Philippine archipelago while designating the Spratlys as a “regime of islands.” This situation would be similar to the UK’s ownership of the Falkland Islands or the US’ ownership of the Hawaiian islands.
This position adopted by the Philippines is unacceptable. The territory of the Philippines is clearly outlined in Article 3 of the 1898 Treaty of Paris between the US and Spain, which specified the boundaries using latitudinal and longitudinal positions.
Afterwards, the Philippines amended the baseline by passing the Baseline Law in 1961 and Republic Act 5446 in 1968. Presidential Decree 1596 issued in 1978 claimed the Kalayaan Islands as part of the Philippines.
These were all unilateral acts of illegal territorial expansion.
According to Article 3 of the Treaty of Paris, Spain ceded the islands south of the 20th parallel of north latitude to the US. The Batanes Islands, which lie on the 21st parallel, fall outside that range and so do not belong to the Philippines.
The 1961 Baseline Law extended the northern boundary to 21˚ 7’ N. In the same way, Presidential Decree 1596 sought to annex the Spratlys into Philippine territory. Now the Philippines is attempting to take a step further by legislating all of the territory that it claims.
Signatory nations of the Law of the Sea Convention are currently determining their territorial waters, exclusive economic zones, continental shelves and even their continental shelf baselines according to the rules of the convention.
However, international law does not recognize the drawing of archipelagic baselines as a method of claiming sovereignty over a region.
The Philippines wants to annex territory that it does not own by redrawing its archipelagic baseline, but this approach gets it all backwards. This act is a clear violation of the interests of other nations and will lead to international disputes. Since 1955, the Philippines has claimed that it is an archipelago state. This claim was accepted by the convention in 1982, and so it is not in doubt.
However, the convention does not allow a self-proclaimed archipelago state to designate an island group over which it already claims sovereignty as a “regime of islands.”
This also means that the Philippines is prohibited from proclaiming “archipelagic sovereignty” over its main archipelago while claiming an additional “archipelagic sovereignty” over the Spratlys.
The Philippines is a signatory nation to the Law of the Sea Convention, and it happens to be its worst violator. It has unilaterally defined all of the waters that fall within the boundaries of the 1898 treaty as its internal waters and banned foreign ships passing through them.
Taiwanese ships and fishing boats have been serious victims of this policy. Not only are they no longer allowed to pass through those waters, they have also lost access to traditional fish markets in the nearby Batanes and Babuyan Islands.
The Philippine House of Representatives is preparing to complete the drawing of the archipelagic baseline into law before it goes into recess on June 13, but the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee has decided to postpone it.
The Philippines’ unilateral expansion of its territory should be strongly protested. The country should also be urged to rectify its territorial water claims which are in violation of the Law of the Sea Convention.
Chen Hurng-yu is a professor at Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
TRANSLATED BY JAMES CHEN
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s
A 10-year-old Japanese schoolboy was stabbed to death last week in the Chinese city of Shenzhen. Although Beijing called it “an isolated incident that could happen in any country,” the tragedy is widely viewed as a cautionary tale of the consequences of the rise of ultranationalism and xenophobia in China, which has worsened as its economy deteriorates. The suspect is a 44-year-old unemployed Chinese man. The stabbing occurred on Sept. 18 — the sensitive anniversary of the “918” incident of 1931, which is commemorated in China as the start of the Japanese invasion of northeast Manchuria. Chinese officials and state media
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been pushing nationalist rhetoric and xenophobic education, and now this has led to tragedy. On Wednesday last week — the 93rd anniversary of the Mukden Incident, when Japan launched its invasion of Manchuria — a 10-year-old Japanese boy living in Shenzhen was stabbed to death on his way to school. This is the second time this year a Japanese citizen has been attacked in public in China. In addition to the attacks on Japanese residing in China, five US college teachers were injured in a knife attack in June. These attacks show a surge of