While EU finance ministers burnt the midnight oil in their desperate search for a solution to the euro crisis, they knew they were in the next and potentially most damaging phase of the financial crisis that has gripped world markets since the summer of 2007.
At the very least, the stakes were as high as they were in the aftermath of the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008. After the global markets closed on Friday night last week, policymakers were alarmed by a number of factors, not least that trading volumes were high and there were signs that the banking system was seized with panic as it was three years ago. In London, stock market selling was taking place in volumes last seen during the middle of the Lehman crisis. Financial instruments, which help gauge traders’ predictions about the risk of countries and banks defaulting, were reflecting anxiety that a second stage of the credit crunch was developing.
The 110 billion euro (US$140 billion) bailout of Greece announced the week before had not been enough to stop markets worrying about “contagion.” Traders believed that other indebted countries such as Ireland, Portugal and Spain would suffer the same fate as Greece, where the severity of austerity measures has caused rioting on the streets and the deaths of three bank workers. In another echo of the Lehman Brothers debacle, the “who’s next” mentality gripped traders, flooring HBOS in the UK, AIG in the US and three weeks later Royal Bank of Scotland back on this side of the Atlantic. Countries, not consumers and banks, were in the sights of the markets this time.
On Monday, at least, the market was relieved by the outcome of the EU negotiations — which lasted until 2am early that day as eurozone ministers tried to convince the UK to participate in the emergency fund. The European Central Bank (ECB) had heeded desperate calls by dealers to start buying government bonds to inject liquidity into markets but has also set up an emergency fund in readiness for countries next at risk of default on their debt.
Marco Annunziata, chief economist for UniCredit Group, said: “The decision took much longer than expected, but for once the scope of the actions unveiled dwarfed previous leaks and speculation: This is shock and awe, part II and in 3D.”
“This truly is overwhelming force and should be more than sufficient to stabilize markets in the near term, prevent panic and contain the risk of contagion,” he added.
Central banks around the world stepped in to prop up the markets and even Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) opined on the importance of the international effort. “If certain developed countries are not able to effectively cut down expenditures and increase revenues, the possibility that the sovereign debt crisis might spread globally cannot be ruled out,” he said.
Long-standing market participants and experts felt that ever since the problems in Greece emerged, policymakers in the EU had been unable to keep pace with the markets’ concerns and reactions — just as in the aftermath of Lehman Brothers’ collapse.
Nick Parsons, head of strategy at National Australia Bank, said that the measures unveiled to the markets yesterday had now put the policymakers “significantly ahead of the markets during which period we can have a period of fiscal adjustment.”
It is a sentiment echoed by Howard Archer, chief Europe economist of IHS Global Insight. “People are looking at this in the light of Lehman,” he said. “There had been a drip-drip policy response to the Greek situation and there was a perception that the authorities were behind the curve. This has been more gradual [than Lehman] but Greece has been the trigger for all this.”
As long ago as January, there had been concerns that Greece could be the “next Lehman Brothers” — such is the fear in which the collapse of the Wall Street bank is held by markets.
Back then, Gary Jenkins, head of fixed income research at brokers Evolution, predicted: “If the lack of investor confidence leads to funding problems in Greece, market participants will look around and ask themselves the question ‘what looks like Greece?’ Is it Portugal, Italy, Spain? This is where potentially Greece could become the next Lehman’s as investors move from one target to the next just like they did in the banking crises of 2008.”
Yesterday Jenkins said that by the end of last week it had become all apparent that Portugal and Spain were on the brink of joining Greece “in the unable to borrow in the markets club.”
“After total inaction from the ECB, the situation had deteriorated and there was the potential for a complete meltdown in the market this week,” he said.
Hence the need for urgent and decisive action by the EU, particularly as banks had been buying Portuguese and Spanish bonds to help bolster their returns and now faced huge losses.
“That is one of the reasons why the EU has had to provide such a massive support package now. It is not just trying to save the banking sector, but it is saving the government bond sector, and therefore itself,” Jenkins said.
The key question in the market, just as it was after governments around the world bailed out their banks after Lehman collapsed, is this: How long will the emergency measures last before a new crisis erupts? The taxpayer bailout of the banks was followed a few months later by schemes to protect banks from the bad debts — the troubled asset relief program in the US and the asset protection scheme in the UK.
Geoffrey Wood, professor of economics at Cass Business School, is scathing about the deal.
“They haven’t addressed the fundamental problems. They haven’t fiscal transfers and they haven’t thought through how to handle differences in productivity,” Wood said.
Parsons reckons the EU has given itself a year’s breathing space while Simon Ward of the fund management group Henderson notes it will “suppress contagion and ease near-term financing but does not remove longer-term solvency concerns.”
Market experts note that while there have been some dramatic recoveries in markets — French and German stock markets have rallied more than 8 percent — other indicators about sentiment are less vitriolic. The much-watched rate at which banks lend to each other in the money markets — known as the three-month sterling LIBOR — remained at elevated levels yesterday. A sign, perhaps, of the nervousness that remains.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s