President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has a dream for all of us in Taiwan — a big China dream that heralds a cross-strait common market and jumps to the conclusion that the local economy will surely benefit from cooperation with Beijing.
However, the reality is that most of the nation’s middle-income earners and financially disadvantaged groups have been suffering from price hikes of more than 20 percent as a result of the anticipated closer ties with China, all in the midst of years of flattened salary growth.
Skyrocketing property prices, especially in Taipei, are a good example of the speculation going on as investors anticipate the economic deal.
So no one should blame Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) for his unilateral yet well-intended decision to halt auctions of government-owned land in Taipei by the National Property Administration under the Ministry of Finance.
It appears the government is the victim of bad timing and is in a catch-22 situation. The sale of public land has led some to accuse the government of fueling the nation’s growing property bubbles and for competing with the private sector for quick gains from Taipei’s overheating real-estate market.
Nevertheless, as several realtors and land developers have warned, the premier’s decision to cease the sales may backfire. It could squeeze the city’s already tight supply of land and push land prices even higher.
Also, if not now, when should the government put its public land — at an estimated market value of NT$2 trillion (US$62.5 billion) — back on the agenda again?
Taiwan has come a long way and reached a consensus on liberalizing the use of public land, which used to sit idle under various government agencies. The government has been heavily criticized for being the nation’s “biggest landlord.”
If the China deal does work out as the Ma government hopes and provides a big boost to the local economy, domestic property prices are sure to climb. That would be an even worse time for the government to release any land because it will be further accused of merely seeking to maximize returns. To avoid such accusations, the government could completely cease selling land.
Another scenario is that the China deal may not work out quite as the Ma government has planned.
More and more analysts have begun to realize that the effect of the planned economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China may be exaggerated and, even though the government has concentrated all its efforts in pushing for the deal, it will not provide a long-term driver for the local market.
Just yesterday, William Dong (董成康), a managing director of UBS Securities, said that “the ECFA will only put Taiwan on an equal footing with its regional trading partners, but will not provide a significant boost to [Taiwan’s] GDP growth.”
If that holds true, it will be a wake-up call for many, whether they are in the property market or not.
It will be another example of the government shooting itself in the foot by not having thought through the consequences of putting all its eggs in the China basket.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s