Three years after the Sept. 19, 2006, coup that toppled then-prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, only the military has something to smile about in Thailand’s current political climate.
The pro-Thaksin United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) today plans to gather thousands of protesters in Bangkok to condemn the putsch that ousted their leader.
Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, 45, has imposed the Internal Security Act in the capital to ensure that the protest will not turn into a street brawl over the weekend or while he is attending the UN General Assembly next week.
The Internal Security Act allows the military a role in cracking down on protests should they get out of hand, as they did on April 11 when red-shirted UDD demonstrators raided the venue of an Asian summit being held in Pattaya, 100km southeast of Bangkok, forcing Abhisit to cancel the event.
Abhisit had to declare a state of emergency on April 12 as the UDD protest moved to Bangkok, allowing the army to step in and crack down on what had developed into street fighting a day later. Two people died in the clashes.
Democrat Party leader Abhisit, who has been prime minister for the past nine months, owes the military establishment in more ways than one for his current job.
Army Commander-in-Chief General Anupong Paojinda was openly opposed to the previous coalition government led by the pro-Thaksin People Power Party (PPP).
When former prime minister Samak Sundaravej declared a state of emergency last October in an effort to rid Government House of yellow-shirted anti-Thaksin protestors, Anupong did nothing.
Later he publicly called on Somchai Wongsawat, Samak’s successor, to resign. When the PPP was dissolved by a Constitution Court ruling in December, the military allegedly played a pivotal role in persuading certain pro-Thaksin politicians to switch allegiances and join the Democrats in setting up a new coalition government.
The current military establishment has arguably found the perfect way for influencing Thai politics without resorting to coups.
“The armed forces today have found their perfect niche,” said Paul Chambers, a political scientist from Germany’s Ruprecht-Karls University. “They have this weak civilian government, and the international community will not blame them if anything goes wrong with the economy.”
The military has had decades of practice in Thai politics.
It was a group of Young Turk officers who staged a coup in 1932, ending the absolute monarchy and replacing it with a democratic system under a constitutional monarchy.
Over the past 77 years there have been long years of military rule, interspersed with 18 coups against civilian governments, with the latest ones in 2006 and 1991.
The military’s role in politics arguably reached a nadir after May 1992, when troops were called to Bangkok to put down a mass demonstration against the appointment of former army commander-in chief Suchinda Krapayoon as prime minister.
After a bloody crackdown, leaving at least 44 protesters dead, Suchinda was forced to resign, and for 14 years the military was sidelined, allowing Thailand to gain a reputation as one of Asia’s most progressive democracies, especially after the promulgation of the 1997 Constitution, deemed the country’s most liberal, and supportive of elected governments and political parties.
Unfortunately, the liberal charter was abused by Thaksin, a billionaire businessman who became prime minister in 2001 on populist policies that won him wide support from Thailand’s urban and rural poor.
Thaksin has evolved into a democratic hero for his followers over the past three years, partly because he was the victim of a coup.
“Now that Thaksin is the symbol of democracy in this country, we’ve forgotten what he was in the past,” said Chris Baker, the co-author of several books on the Thaksin years. “During 2004 to 2005 Thaksin engaged in closing down a lot of the state democracy in this country.”
Because of the groundswell of anti-Thaksin sentiment at the time, especially among the Bangkok middle class and political elite, the bloodless 2006 coup was largely welcomed in Thailand, but widely condemned abroad.
The coup brought direct benefits for the military, which saw their budget increase 60 percent in 2007 and 18 percent last year.
But other than feathering its own nest, the military did a poor job in setting up an interim government to run Thailand for a year after the coup, and also failed to prevent a pro-Thaksin government from returning to power in the Dec. 23, 2007, general election.
“The coup in 2006 indicated that launching a coup is one thing, to govern the country is another,” Thai political scientist Suchit Bunbongkarn told a recent seminar.
“The military realizes now that the problems facing the country are too complicated to be solved by a military coup,” he said.
Others argue that they don’t need one, since they have proven themselves adept over the past year at influencing the rise and fall of governments without resorting to tanks.
“The military has become Thailand’s crucial, clandestine player,” according to long-time political watcher Chambers. “The armed forces today [have] an even better deal than they had 30 years ago.”
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
Tomorrow is the 78th anniversary of the 228 Incident. On Monday, at a meeting with the Overseas 2-28 Survivors Homecoming Group at the Presidential Office, President William Lai (賴清德) spoke of the importance of protecting the nation’s freedom and sovereignty. The 228 Incident is in the past, but the generational trauma exists in the present. The imperative to protect the nation’s sovereignty and liberty from Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aggression will remain for the foreseeable future. The chaos and budget cuts in the legislature threaten the endeavor. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have worked together to
RSS