Arab states — and Israel — are watching intently as Iran’s political convulsions continue, seeking clues to how the unfolding crisis will affect the strategic picture in the Middle East, especially the key issue of the Islamic republic’s nuclear ambitions.
In a region where democratic politics are the exception, there is nervousness about the implications of people power on the streets of Tehran. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is deeply unpopular — but mass protests worry all autocrats.
ISRAEL
Officially and in public, at least, Israeli officials have spoken of their deep concern about Ahmadinejad’s apparent re-election. Israel’s rightwing government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has made a priority of challenging Iran’s nuclear ambitions. On Sunday night, Netanyahu said the world’s greatest challenge today was “the nexus between radical Islam and nuclear weapons.”
However, in private, Israeli officials appeared to be hoping for an Ahmadinejad victory even before the polls opened, despite his vitriolic criticism of Israel, his denial of the Holocaust and his apparent eagerness for a nuclear weapons program.
Israeli newspapers quoted several senior officials anonymously saying a win for Ahmadinejad would help Israel because, as they saw it, none of the candidates differed very much on policy and Ahmadinejad’s strong language and blunt actions made him easier to criticize internationally.
“Considering the circumstances, he is the best thing that ever happened to us,” one foreign ministry official was quoted as saying in the popular Ma’ariv newspaper last Friday.
Ben Caspit, a Ma’ariv columnist, put it even more bluntly that morning: “If you have friends in Iran, try to convince them to vote for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today ... There is no one who will serve Israel’s PR interests better.”
Far fewer were the voices who questioned that line of thinking. Among them was Aluf Benn, a Ha’aretz columnist who dismissed the support for Ahmadinejad as a “blatant manifestation of the narrow horizons of Israeli strategic thinking.”
LEBANON
Recently emerging from their own political upheavals, savvy Lebanese see much of themselves in the people politics unfolding in Tehran.
“It reminds me of our protests,” said Haitham Chamas, an activist who helped organize protests in 2005 that brought 1 million Lebanese to the streets calling for democratic reforms and the fall of the government.
Just as in Tehran, that opposition was swiftly answered by a huge rally in support of the incumbent regime, organized then by Hezbollah, which is allied with Iran and Syria.
Chamas and friends have spent the last week talking of little else but what the historic events unfolding in Iran could mean for Lebanon, where Iranian financing of Hezbollah has divided opinion like never before.
The Western-backed government, known as March 14, recently beat Hezbollah and its allies in undisputed elections.
“I think if [defeated Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein] Mousavi’s supporters stay on the streets for a week the regime will fall and that will seriously affect Hezbollah,” Chamas said.
Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, was quick to congratulate Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on his disputed re-election, saying it represented “great hope to all the oppressed people.”
In the Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs of Beirut, men and women speak admiringly of Ahmadinejad as a true leader of the Shiite cause and brand Mousavi “Iran’s March 14 candidate.”
But for those who see Iran as meddling in Lebanon’s affairs, the turmoil in Tehran brings a certain satisfaction.
“Now the Iranians are arranging their own house, so perhaps we can expect a little less interference in ours,” said Sawssan Abou Zahr, a journalist with An Nahar newspaper.
IRAQ
Iran’s near neighbor and former arch-foe has remained largely silent in the wake of the post-election revolt.
The Iraqi street is paying little heed to the contested result and national leaders have passed only cursory congratulations to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the tumultuous days since.
Lawmakers from the Shiite parties have mostly refused public comment to Iraqi media. Many maintain close links to establishment figures in Tehran and some owe their careers to the patronage of Shiite Islamic clerics and supporters.
However, with elections just over six months away, Iraqi MPs are keen to distance themselves from the perception of foreign sponsorship and to concentrate on shaping a sovereign state.
On the streets, people were ambivalent.
“This is the Middle East,” said a woman from Baghdad. “Wars and revolutions happen all the time.”
GULF STATES
In Saudi Arabia, Iran’s main Arab adversary and leader of the conservative US-backed camp, the government has made no public comment. But there are signs of concern about the effect of the unrest on the Shiite majority in the kingdom’s oil-producing eastern provinces.
“The Saudis are watching this upheaval and internal divisions with satisfaction,” said political analyst Mai Yamani. “It weakens the aggressive ambitions of Iran as they see it. It also damages the prospects for talks between the [US President Barack] Obama administration and Iran, which they feel would be at Saudi expense if they succeeded.”
The United Arab Emirates, which has a long-running dispute with Iran over three tiny Gulf islands, congratulated Ahmadinejad. Dubai, home to a large Iranian expatriate community, banned election-related protests.
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to
RSS