Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Chiang Nai-shin (蔣乃辛) won the legislative by-election in Taipei City’s Da-an District on Saturday, but the party had cause for concern since its victory in the traditional KMT stronghold — which is home to many top KMT members — was far from decisive compared with past polls.
Chiang received 46,065 votes, or 48.91 percent, down from the KMT’s 66.8 percent win in Da-an in last year’s legislative election. Even counting the 9,868 votes for New Party candidate Yao Li-ming (姚立明), the pan-blue camp still won only half the number of votes received by the KMT last year. That should have the KMT worried about the county commissioner and mayoral elections scheduled for December.
Low voter turnout on Saturday and the narrow margin of less than 10,000 ballots between the pan-green and pan-blue camps indicated that voters are dissatisfied with the KMT government’s performance and the controversy over former KMT legislator Diane Lee’s (李慶安) dual citizenship. The outcry surrounding former diplomat Kuo Kuan-ying’s (郭冠英) hate-filled articles may also have played a role.
Two weeks ago, the KMT’s loss in the legislative by-election in Miaoli County served as a warning. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) and several Cabinet ministers turned out to stump for Chiang, and the Taipei City Government was accused of devoting resources to boost his election campaign. The KMT was able to prevent a split in the pan-blue vote, keeping Yao’s votes below 10,000, but 49 percent of the vote was nevertheless an embarrassment compared with the more than 60 percent the party has enjoyed in recent presidential, mayoral and legislative elections.
The Democratic Progressive Party’s Chou Po-ya (周柏雅) took close to 39 percent of the vote, claiming the party’s best-ever result in the Da-an constituency in terms of percentage. In terms of number of votes, however, Chou’s result of 36,465 fell short of the 48,240 votes won by DPP candidate Luo Wen-chia (羅文嘉) in last year’s legislative election. The DPP clearly failed to mobilize its supporters and has no reason to be complacent.
Some in the pan-blue camp saw the by-election as a vote of confidence in the government and felt it would reflect public attitudes toward the corruption case against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). In fact, allegations of corruption against the former first family have been hitting the DPP at the polls since 2005. Although the DPP lost in Da-an, the start of the Chen trial did not erode its support there. The Chen case may influence the December elections, but it will not decide the outcome.
With the economy in recession and no recovery in sight, the government will struggle to improve its scorecard between now and the end of the year. The DPP, meanwhile, may have passed a low point and be on the verge of recovering support, but it will have to make its case with sound proposals that offer a viable alternative to current government policies.
The year-end polls may still be eight months away, but one thing is clear: Neither the DPP nor the KMT will have an easy ride.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS