THE MELAMINE-CONTAMINATED milk powder scandal has shaken Taiwan’s food industry and has scared the living daylights out of the public. However, prior to this incident, there were many warning signs such as poor quality starch, poisonous hairy crabs and grouper fish as well as pork containing ractopamine, an additive used in pig feed to tenderize pork. But what have our authorities learned from these incidents?
The commotion surrounding the contaminated milk powder will subside sooner or later, but will we ever be able to trust that our food is safe after this? I have been teaching food safety for more than 20 years in university and am active in issues related to the Department of Health (DOH) and the health bureau in several cities and counties.
Taiwan still lacks a complete system for managing food safety and with all the questionable Chinese products, similar incidents will continue to occur if we cannot establish a thorough system for managing food safety.
Can the establishment of a food and drug administration really resolve the problem? If there is no change in the attitude or the way our senior officials think, nothing will ever change. I want to share some observations made over the years in the hope they may be a useful reference.
First, it was wrong of legislators and the public to solely blame the health department for the melamine scandal. The Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection (BSMI) is responsible for controlling food imports, while the department is responsible for food safety after products reach stores.
Testing for melamine was not part of the regular food-safety tests, and this was the same in other countries worldwide. Now that there has been melamine contamination, all the health department can do is prepare itself to guard against future occurrences, although officials there have seemed confused and erratic about their plans.
Second, the Bureau of Food Sanitation (BFS) is severely underfunded and the least respected agency in a system that emphasizes medicine and medical treatment. In addition, apart from BFS and BSMI staffers, most employees of health bureaus nationwide have backgrounds in veterinary science, public health or nursing.
The lack of staff with a background in food safety is widespread. This situation has not improved for more than 20 years. The BFS has had five directors, two whose backgrounds were in pharmacology. With non-specialists leading specialists, how are we supposed to draw up effective policies for national food safety?
Third, although some DOH managers have administrative ability, many have become arrogant and incapable of listening to advice, not to mention the public’s concerns. Each year, the health department, the Council of Agriculture and the Industrial Development Bureau allot huge sums to private organizations for national technology development programs. However, it is not clear who is in charge of assessing the effectiveness of these programs.
There are also senior officials who take on health-related managerial positions in the private industry after they retire. This leads to the question of how effective our “revolving-door” restriction has been.
Fourth, in the past few years, government restructuring has resulted in the merging of health bureau food and drug departments into a food and drug division, where most directors have pharmacology backgrounds. This is proof that food safety has been neglected to the point of nonexistence.
Finally, food inspections by health authorities are mostly focused on inspection, sampling and doling out fines. But what good has this done? More and more products are found violating the limits on hydrogen peroxide, additives, coloring and chemical pesticides.
Three years ago, Taoyuan County’s Bureau of Food Sanitation came up with a breakthrough strategy to establish certifications for local brands to encourage them to improve their practices. This strategy was reportedly praised by a head of the DOH.
Taiwan’s food industry is not very large, and lacks specialized technical knowledge. We do not need idealistic slogans for food safety policies.
If we are unable to solve the fundamental problems in our system, what use are strict punishment and more legislation?
We need to focus our attention on the fundamentals. The general public do not need to be told about parts per million this or that. What they want is to be able to eat their food without having to worry about negative side effects.
Perry Chiu is a food science professor at Fu Jen Catholic University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS