THE MELAMINE-CONTAMINATED milk powder scandal has shaken Taiwan’s food industry and has scared the living daylights out of the public. However, prior to this incident, there were many warning signs such as poor quality starch, poisonous hairy crabs and grouper fish as well as pork containing ractopamine, an additive used in pig feed to tenderize pork. But what have our authorities learned from these incidents?
The commotion surrounding the contaminated milk powder will subside sooner or later, but will we ever be able to trust that our food is safe after this? I have been teaching food safety for more than 20 years in university and am active in issues related to the Department of Health (DOH) and the health bureau in several cities and counties.
Taiwan still lacks a complete system for managing food safety and with all the questionable Chinese products, similar incidents will continue to occur if we cannot establish a thorough system for managing food safety.
Can the establishment of a food and drug administration really resolve the problem? If there is no change in the attitude or the way our senior officials think, nothing will ever change. I want to share some observations made over the years in the hope they may be a useful reference.
First, it was wrong of legislators and the public to solely blame the health department for the melamine scandal. The Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection (BSMI) is responsible for controlling food imports, while the department is responsible for food safety after products reach stores.
Testing for melamine was not part of the regular food-safety tests, and this was the same in other countries worldwide. Now that there has been melamine contamination, all the health department can do is prepare itself to guard against future occurrences, although officials there have seemed confused and erratic about their plans.
Second, the Bureau of Food Sanitation (BFS) is severely underfunded and the least respected agency in a system that emphasizes medicine and medical treatment. In addition, apart from BFS and BSMI staffers, most employees of health bureaus nationwide have backgrounds in veterinary science, public health or nursing.
The lack of staff with a background in food safety is widespread. This situation has not improved for more than 20 years. The BFS has had five directors, two whose backgrounds were in pharmacology. With non-specialists leading specialists, how are we supposed to draw up effective policies for national food safety?
Third, although some DOH managers have administrative ability, many have become arrogant and incapable of listening to advice, not to mention the public’s concerns. Each year, the health department, the Council of Agriculture and the Industrial Development Bureau allot huge sums to private organizations for national technology development programs. However, it is not clear who is in charge of assessing the effectiveness of these programs.
There are also senior officials who take on health-related managerial positions in the private industry after they retire. This leads to the question of how effective our “revolving-door” restriction has been.
Fourth, in the past few years, government restructuring has resulted in the merging of health bureau food and drug departments into a food and drug division, where most directors have pharmacology backgrounds. This is proof that food safety has been neglected to the point of nonexistence.
Finally, food inspections by health authorities are mostly focused on inspection, sampling and doling out fines. But what good has this done? More and more products are found violating the limits on hydrogen peroxide, additives, coloring and chemical pesticides.
Three years ago, Taoyuan County’s Bureau of Food Sanitation came up with a breakthrough strategy to establish certifications for local brands to encourage them to improve their practices. This strategy was reportedly praised by a head of the DOH.
Taiwan’s food industry is not very large, and lacks specialized technical knowledge. We do not need idealistic slogans for food safety policies.
If we are unable to solve the fundamental problems in our system, what use are strict punishment and more legislation?
We need to focus our attention on the fundamentals. The general public do not need to be told about parts per million this or that. What they want is to be able to eat their food without having to worry about negative side effects.
Perry Chiu is a food science professor at Fu Jen Catholic University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS