King Car Industrial Co, a reputable company in the food business, chose to purchase ingredients for its powdered instant beverages and soups from Duqing Inc in China’s Shandong Province as a means of diversifying sourcing and ensuring a constant supply of raw materials in the face of rising prices and commodity shortages.
When news came out about contaminated milk powder from China, King Car asked Duqing if melamine — an industrial chemical used to make plastics and fertilizers — was present in any of its products.
Duqing gave its word that there was none. Nevertheless, in the interests of consumer health and safety and acting on its own initiative, King Car sent samples of all its products to the Food Industry Research and Development Institute for testing.
The firm’s powdered instant beverages tested positive for melamine.
As soon as King Car received the results, the firm took a number of steps to resolve the issue.
It informed the Department of Health, recalled affected products, checked its remaining stock of possibly tainted items and kept them under lock and key.
The company also set up a hotline to deal with consumer inquiries and complaints and announced its willingness to accept responsibility for and pay compensation to any consumers who had suffered ill effects.
In contrast, at least until Thursday last week, Duqing covered up the facts by sending King Car a written guarantee that its products did not contain melamine.
There is a stark contrast between these two companies — one Taiwanese and the other Chinese — in their attitude to consumer protection and their willingness, or reluctance, to accept corporate responsibility for their actions.
I have a few suggestions on how to deal with this case and companies that behave like this.
We should encourage companies to take the initiative to send suspicious product samples for testing, and recall all products and take remedial measures whenever contamination is found.
At the same time, we should condemn companies that ignore the safety of customers and cover up the facts. In such cases, the Department of Health should promptly inform the World Health Organization, while consumers’ groups should report such incidents to the global consumer protection body Consumers International.
Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) should immediately protest to Beijing through existing channels of communication.
Second, the government should test all processed and unprocessed foodstuffs imported from China to safeguard consumer health.
In the spirit of corporate accountability, importers should test samples of their products or send them to qualified laboratories for testing before placing them on the market.
The SEF and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait should negotiate terms for testing foodstuffs traded in both directions and establish a procedure of mutual notification.
Duqing hid the truth and had no regard for the health of its customers. It knew that its products were contaminated with melamine but issued a document guaranteeing that they were melamine-free. This constitutes a criminal act.
Importers should file suit for compensation, because crimes like these should not be tolerated.
Lee Shen-yi is honorary chairman of the Consumers’ Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG AND EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS