This year’s Mid-Autumn Festival was spoiled by concerns over the damage caused by Typhoon Sinlaku and worries about moon cakes and milk tea made with poisonous milk powder.
The Sanlu brand of milk powder manufactured in China was found to be poisonous because it contained melamine, a material used in the production of laminate paneling and disposable plastic utensils. Consuming too much melamine can cause kidney stones and even uremia. If one were to ingest melamine in a moon cake, drinking plenty of water would probably remove it from the body, health specialists say.
In these tough economic times, people have less money to spend on expensive, quality moon cakes, but buying cheaper moon cakes in a neighborhood store meant worrying about melamine. Consumer protection officials offer no solution, telling us that people cannot get their money back.
Is there really nothing we can do, though, apart from “sucking it up?”
A Department of Health (DOH) official said nitrogen levels double or triple for each extra part of melamine that is added to milk powder to make the protein count appear higher. The official said tighter tests and inspections on Chinese milk powder could help ease consumer concerns, while also limiting potential damage. But the entire import process shows that at the time of its importation, the Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection (BSMI) did not take any samples.
Even worse, the DOH did not investigate the matter until the Straits Exchange Foundation was informed by China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait. Taiwanese consumer protection officials have failed to reassure consumers and the government must take the main responsibility for this incident.
The number of food and agricultural products imported from China is much higher than most people think. In particular, products produced in China by Taiwanese businesses are imported via joint ventures and then sold in Taiwan. These products are often legally dubious as it is difficult to ascertain their country of origin.
The Sanlu milk powder was imported by the Taiwanese branch of New Zealand-owned Fonterra Ltd because of its cheaper price. It entered Taiwan easily because it was imported by a foreign-owned subsidiary.
If it had been imported by a Taiwanese dealer directly from the Sanlu Group, the BSMI might have paid more attention to the product and its safety.
On the positive side, this incident has provided the government with the perfect opportunity to establish a more complete set of procedures for monitoring trade with China. Regardless of whether the importer is a foreign-owned or a Taiwanese company, a definite set of standards and procedures should apply to imports from China.
To protect consumers, the government must lay down strict regulations requiring that the origin of ingredients be shown on the label. This would also help distinguish between locally made and imported products. Local products are often at a disadvantage because of higher costs, but are of a higher quality as they have to follow local regulations and professional ethics.
There is a market for cheap imported products. But to meet different demands and allow consumers to make informed choices, clear labels displaying a product’s country of origin are necessary.
It should also be mandatory for importers to provide liability insurance for their products to stop them placing profit above the health of consumers.
Lei Li-fen is a professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS