President-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has expressed grave concern over the impact of the Papua New Guinea (PNG) diplomatic scandal on Taiwan's reputation. He pledged to adopt a pragmatic and open approach to developing diplomatic ties.
To avoid the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s mistake of using brokers to lure PNG into establishing relations, Ma said his administration would prioritize negotiations with China on economic and cultural exchanges, a peace agreement and protection of Taiwan’s international space as part of efforts to develop international relations.
He said that “Diplomacy is the art of the possible ... The possibility of advancing Taiwan’s diplomatic relations is limited, but we may be able to break new ground by combining diplomacy with cross-strait relations.”
The PNG diplomatic setback serves as a cruel lesson for both the outgoing DPP and the incoming Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on whether Taiwan should or could renounce the use of dollar diplomacy.
Before the DPP came to power in 2000, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) supported an overhaul of the KMT’s longstanding strategy of dollar diplomacy. He also suggested that the importance of the number of diplomatic allies was overstated.
Nevertheless, foreign policy has its own consistency and continuity. Chen’s administration continued the KMT’s practices with only minor adjustments. Using “brokers” to expand Taiwan’s limited international presence was one of these.
Now the Ma administration seems about to reverse this trend and place all bets on the improvement of cross-strait relations as the key to a diplomatic truce.
Is this goal achievable, and at what cost? Will China recognize the need for a diplomatic ceasefire? Ma would be indulging in wishful thinking if he thought so.
Rather, Ma needs to come up with a new foreign policy agenda in the South Pacific to rebuild Taiwan’s image in the region and redirect its aid programs.
Taiwan has six allies in the region. Diplomatic competition in the region appears to be evenly balanced, and this causes tremendous concern in countries such as Australia and New Zealand.
In a region of strategic significance and complicated geography, Beijing has reached out and exerted increasing influence through more frequent state visits and larger aid programs.
Because China is constantly trying to steal allies, it is imperative that Taiwan engage in diplomatic efforts to consolidate its diplomatic relations. Countering Beijing’s initiatives to broaden international influence and expand the “one China” principle will require frequent trips to the region by Taiwan’s president.
The next government should develop strategies extending its diplomatic influence in the South Pacific through provision of humanitarian aid, inculcation of good governance, regular consultation with regional powers and, most importantly, transforming its diplomatic methods.
It is a shame to see the DPP government failing to overcome the dollar diplomacy that it inherited from the KMT.
If the Ma administration is determined to reshape foreign policy, it needs clearer guidelines from the top to frontline diplomats on how to deal with their rivals.
Local media have reported that Ma has decided to make his first state visit to the nation’s diplomatic allies in Central America on Aug. 12, with stopovers in New York and Washington.
Will Beijing then cease pressuring the US on presidential stopovers? How would Ma react to Chinese obstruction and humiliation on his very first overseas tour?
Can he strike a balance between improving cross-strait relations and pursuing a diplomatic truce?
Liu Shih-chung is a Taipei-based political commentator.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic