While the nation engages in heated discussion about the Papua New Guinea fund scandal, Taiwan's sovereignty is being trampled internationally. The media ignores this and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs seems to be busy with internal troubles.
Late last month, crew members from a Greenpeace ship boarded the Taiwanese tuna boat Nian Sheng 3 while it was fishing in the southwestern Pacific Ocean. Not finding any proof of illegal activities, the activists escorted the ship out of international waters, with the excuse that they wanted to protect tuna. These actions violate Taiwan's right of sovereignty over ships flying its flag in international waters.
But all Taiwan did was have the Fisheries Agency issue some weak protests and send a letter to the secretarial office of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) asking it to uphold justice. Greenpeace is not a member of the WCPFC, but even if it were, the commission is a management organization with no power to handle rights violations -- in any case, the WCPFC's next meeting isn]t until the end of this year. The actions of the Fisheries Agency are not only too late, they are also aimed at the wrong recipient. Meanwhile, the foreign ministry has done nothing. Then early this month Greenpeace again raided another Taiwanese ship, the Ho Tsai Fa 18.
Ships in international waters fall under the jurisdiction of the country where the ship is registered -- its flag state. This is one of the fundamental principles of international law. The ship's captain has no right to allow others to board the ship, and any such action that has not been agreed to by the authorities of the flag state is illegal and constitutes a clear and serious infringement of national sovereignty.
In 1989, Taiwanese fishing boats were found salmon fishing, perhaps illegally, in the north Pacific near the US. A boat from the US Coast Guard asked permission for observers to come aboard to investigate, which Taiwan categorically refused. Although observers were worried that the Taiwanese boat would dump the fish to destroy the presumed evidence, the US ship only followed the fishing boat for a few thousand nautical miles until it reached Taiwanese waters, where local authorities took control of the investigation. That a country as big and strong as the US doesn]t dare to board a foreign fishing boat shows its respect for this fundamental rule.
A system for boarding boats in international waters was implemented in the central and western Pacific this year -- the most advanced measure taken so far by any international fishery organization to enforce laws on protection and management. Taiwan has dedicated many years and dozens of negotiation rounds to arrange mutual boarding mechanisms with different countries. Countries that want crew to be allowed to board Taiwanese fishing boats can only do so after agreeing to give Taiwan the same rights.
To implement this mechanism, the US, New Zealand, France and Canada have already registered their ships. At this crucial moment, Greenpeace's repeated actions pose a serious threat to the future of the mechanism. If Taiwan doesn]t understand how to voice its determination to protect its national sovereignty, then it will be hard to imagine how registered ships from other countries will treat Taiwan's ships in the future.
Several things can be done to help remedy the situation.
First, the foreign ministry should send a letter to Taiwan's representative office in the Netherlands to be delivered to Greenpeace headquarters, lodging a protest and demanding a public written apology. If Greenpeace stands by its reckless actions, then Taiwan should use its position as a member of international fishery management organizations to block Greenpeace's status as an observer.
Second, the Coast Guard Administration should dispatch ships as soon as possible to closely monitor Taiwanese fishing boats, showing that Taiwan is sincere in protecting and managing fishing resources and following the laws of the sea and the relevant rules of western and central Pacific fishery groups. It would also show the international community that Taiwan is determined and able to defend its jurisdiction over vessels registered under the Taiwanese flag.
Third, the Fisheries Agency should point out that crews of boats of other countries are not allowed to board Taiwanese fishing boats in international waters without permission from the Taiwanese government, regardless of the boat's nationality. If this results in any damages, Taiwan should follow the precedent set by the "temporary enforcement line†standard between Taiwan and Japan, and the government should take all responsibility.
Chiang Huang-chih is an associate professor at National Taiwan University's College of Law.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS