One of the greatest challenges facing the country is how to cope with outbreaks of disease and protect public health.
The SARS epidemic in 2003 highlighted the need for a sound outbreak prevention system, the means for rapid analyzing outbreaks, ready emergency responses, transparency in information on outbreaks and proper public health education.
Dengue fever broke out for the first time in Kaohsiung, Pingtung and Tainan after the government opened the country to tourism in 1987.
In recent years, the scale of the disease has extended and the number of dengue hemorrhagic fever cases has increased, a warning that serious challenges will come in the wake of global warming.
Moreover, the early outbreak of critical cases of enteroviral infections this year has shown that there is still room for improvement in the integration of an outbreak prevention system and epidemiological research.
As cross-strait direct charter flights, which are scheduled to start in July, will greatly increase the number of people entering the country every day, we may wonder whether the nation’s disease prevention systems are sufficiently prepared for impending challenges.
There are several actions the government should take to protect the public.
First, a flexible, pragmatic and time-efficient epidemic prevention system should be developed.
After the SARS epidemic and terrorist attacks using anthrax in the US, depending solely on passive reporting by hospitals is not enough to provide correct and effective emergency responses. It is necessary to upgrade the system to one in which a public health unit actively reports information on outbreaks, including integration of the acute disease syndromes prevention system with microbiology experiments or examination and surveillance of drug sales. Most importantly, the government must keep up with the latest trends in advanced countries.
Second, it should promote open, impartial and transparent policies of outbreak prevention, research and emergency responses through interdisciplinary cooperation.
Taiwan’s past epidemic prevention policies were mostly centralized.
When an outbreak began to spread or the central government made a wrong decision, it usually failed to address the situation and the bottom-up emergency response capability was lost as well.
It is necessary that government officials avoid conflicts of interest and that amateur personnel not end up leading professional personnel.
Third, the country should join and help build international systems for cooperative outbreak prevention.
Although Taiwan has long been excluded from access to the epidemic prevention systems of the WHO because of political reasons, when faced with a drastic increase of new outbreaks, the incoming government should actively participate in Asia-Pacific regional outbreak prevention systems.
Taiwan should provide outbreak surveillance techniques and support in international information exchange, taking a position as a joint epidemic prevention center with surrounding countries in order to fulfill its obligations and responsibilities to promote international health.
King Chwan-chuen is a professor at the Institute of Epidemiology in the College of Public Health at National Taiwan University. Wu Tsung-shu is a former substitute service draftee in public health for the Malawi medical mission.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
RSS