One of the greatest challenges facing the country is how to cope with outbreaks of disease and protect public health.
The SARS epidemic in 2003 highlighted the need for a sound outbreak prevention system, the means for rapid analyzing outbreaks, ready emergency responses, transparency in information on outbreaks and proper public health education.
Dengue fever broke out for the first time in Kaohsiung, Pingtung and Tainan after the government opened the country to tourism in 1987.
In recent years, the scale of the disease has extended and the number of dengue hemorrhagic fever cases has increased, a warning that serious challenges will come in the wake of global warming.
Moreover, the early outbreak of critical cases of enteroviral infections this year has shown that there is still room for improvement in the integration of an outbreak prevention system and epidemiological research.
As cross-strait direct charter flights, which are scheduled to start in July, will greatly increase the number of people entering the country every day, we may wonder whether the nation’s disease prevention systems are sufficiently prepared for impending challenges.
There are several actions the government should take to protect the public.
First, a flexible, pragmatic and time-efficient epidemic prevention system should be developed.
After the SARS epidemic and terrorist attacks using anthrax in the US, depending solely on passive reporting by hospitals is not enough to provide correct and effective emergency responses. It is necessary to upgrade the system to one in which a public health unit actively reports information on outbreaks, including integration of the acute disease syndromes prevention system with microbiology experiments or examination and surveillance of drug sales. Most importantly, the government must keep up with the latest trends in advanced countries.
Second, it should promote open, impartial and transparent policies of outbreak prevention, research and emergency responses through interdisciplinary cooperation.
Taiwan’s past epidemic prevention policies were mostly centralized.
When an outbreak began to spread or the central government made a wrong decision, it usually failed to address the situation and the bottom-up emergency response capability was lost as well.
It is necessary that government officials avoid conflicts of interest and that amateur personnel not end up leading professional personnel.
Third, the country should join and help build international systems for cooperative outbreak prevention.
Although Taiwan has long been excluded from access to the epidemic prevention systems of the WHO because of political reasons, when faced with a drastic increase of new outbreaks, the incoming government should actively participate in Asia-Pacific regional outbreak prevention systems.
Taiwan should provide outbreak surveillance techniques and support in international information exchange, taking a position as a joint epidemic prevention center with surrounding countries in order to fulfill its obligations and responsibilities to promote international health.
King Chwan-chuen is a professor at the Institute of Epidemiology in the College of Public Health at National Taiwan University. Wu Tsung-shu is a former substitute service draftee in public health for the Malawi medical mission.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s