With the reins of the government on the verge of being transferred, a diplomatic scandal has broken out over the disappearance of US$30 million purportedly pocketed by two brokers who had been expected to help forge diplomatic relations between Taiwan and Papua New Guinea in 2006. Last month the government filed lawsuits against the duo in Singapore in an attempt to retrieve the money.
This revelation was another embarrassment for the outgoing Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) administration and has angered and saddened the public. Instead of using diplomatic personnel in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the government depended on “amateur diplomats” outside the ministry to engage in secret diplomacy. Similar operations may have succeeded before, with Vice Premier Chiou I-jen (邱義仁) citing a similar case during the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime, adding that in another case diplomatic relations were broken off just three days after being established.
The Papua New Guinean government has proven time and again that it is insincere and wavering, establishing and severing diplomatic relations with Taiwan several times. To gain some international space, the Taiwanese government had little choice but to agree to such requests. But with the money designated as “foreign aid” to Papua New Guinea allegedly embezzled by the intermediaries, the government finally had to initiate legal proceedings overseas to retrieve the money, turning it into an international incident. Diplomacy is a tough task for weaker countries, but Taiwan must do what it can. This scandal highlights the problems.
Chiou and Minister of Foreign Affairs James Huang (黃志芳) have said they would assume responsibility for the debacle, but with less than 20 days before the government steps down, a resignation to take political responsibility isn’t very meaningful. Chiou and Huang may be very intelligent people, but their deception has resulted in heavy losses for the state and they will end their service with their reputation in tatters. They will be heavily criticized, which may be a heavier punishment than simply resigning. They also face malfeasance lawsuits, which will leave a black stain on their careers regardless of whether they are found guilty.
While condemning the pair for their inappropriate behavior, one must not lose sight of the reason behind Taiwan’s difficult diplomatic situation: the continuous attempts by Beijing to squeeze Taiwan’s diplomatic space. Most countries are intimidated by China’s growing military and economic might, and China is working hard to win over the few that still dare recognize Taiwan. This forces Taiwan to use technical and economic aid or other ways to maintain or win new allies, while China continues to create problems for Taiwan in the few international organizations where the nation is accepted, such as the WTO and APEC.
The scandal may yet put a damper on the latest bout of “China fever” and force pro-China KMT members to wake up to the fact that a change in government does not mean that Beijing will ease up on its suppression of Taiwan or allow Taiwan to expand its international space. Those who continue to harbor this fantasy should brace themselves for China’s answer when it deals with Taiwan’s application to join the World Health Assembly on the same day as Ma’s inauguration on May 20.
It is employment pass renewal season in Singapore, and the new regime is dominating the conversation at after-work cocktails on Fridays. From September, overseas employees on a work visa would need to fulfill the city-state’s new points-based system, and earn a minimum salary threshold to stay in their jobs. While this mirrors what happens in other countries, it risks turning foreign companies away, and could tarnish the nation’s image as a global business hub. The program was announced in 2022 in a bid to promote fair hiring practices. Points are awarded for how a candidate’s salary compares with local peers, along
China last month enacted legislation to punish —including with the death penalty — “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists.” The country’s leaders, including Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), need to be reminded about what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has said and done in the past. They should think about whether those historical figures were also die-hard advocates of Taiwanese independence. The Taiwanese Communist Party was established in the Shanghai French Concession in April 1928, with a political charter that included the slogans “Long live the independence of the Taiwanese people” and “Establish a republic of Taiwan.” The CCP sent a representative, Peng
Japan and the Philippines on Monday signed a defense agreement that would facilitate joint drills between them. The pact was made “as both face an increasingly assertive China,” and is in line with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s “effort to forge security alliances to bolster the Philippine military’s limited ability to defend its territorial interests in the South China Sea,” The Associated Press (AP) said. The pact also comes on the heels of comments by former US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, who said at a forum on Tuesday last week that China’s recent aggression toward the Philippines in
The Ministry of National Defense on Tuesday announced that the military would hold its annual Han Kuang exercises from July 22 to 26. Military officers said the exercises would feature unscripted war games, and a decentralized command and control structure. This year’s exercises underline the recent reforms in Taiwan’s military as it transitions from a top-down command structure to one where autonomy is pushed down to the front lines to improve decisionmaking and adaptability. Militaries around the world have been observing and studying Russia’s war in Ukraine. They have seen that the Ukrainian military has been much quicker to adapt to