The Chinese video addressed “all you bashers” who criticized China’s crackdown on Tibetan protesters and their sympathizers, asserting “Tibet WAS, IS and ALWAYS WILL BE a part of China.” The producers said that the disturbances in Tibet were not riots but outbursts of terror.
There followed scene after scene with belligerent commentary laced with sarcasm and personal attacks, peppered with a sprinkling of foul words not fit for a family newspaper, including liberal use of the “F” word.
The Chinese government, while often objecting to critical reports as being “interference in the internal affairs of China,” rarely hesitates to hurl invective at other nations.
In this case, the Chinese have outdone themselves, especially in blasting foreign media coverage of dissent in Tibet and demonstrations along the Olympic torch relay making its way to Beijing.
The angry campaign seems well coordinated. The official Beijing Olympic Web site overlooks most of the protests. The Xinhua news agency and the People’s Daily, the Chinese Communist Party’s newspaper, are defensive but calm while reporting events.
It is in the Internet blogs that the heat really gets turned up. In particular, one called “anti-CNN.com” claims that it was set up by “volunteers” not connected with the government “to expose the lies and distortions in the Western media.” Whoever runs the blog contends: “We are not against the Western people, but against the prejudice from the Western society.”
None of the Chinese outlets explains how they, or ordinary Chinese, know about what is broadcast or said by the foreign TV and press when relatively few Chinese see foreign media reports. It suggests that Chinese embassies abroad are vacuuming up everything negative that is reported about China as their rebuttals are aimed at reports in English, German, French and Spanish.
CNN is China’s No. 1 target, highlighted by the blog named “anti-CNN.” The network has been labeled “a famous liar with most advanced technology,” “Chinese Negative News” or the “Cheating News Network.”
In particular, Chinese lawyers and government officials pointed to opinions expressed by a CNN commentator, Jack Cafferty, who said in a broadcast: “I think they’re basically the same bunch of goons and thugs they’ve been for the last 50 years.”
China does not have a constitutional First Amendment that permits such judgments to be aired.
Fourteen lawyers filed suit in a Beijing court against CNN this week, asserting they had suffered mental distress. The Chinese government has demanded a “sincere apology.”
Entries on blogs have urged the government to throw CNN correspondents out of the country and to ban network broadcasts inside China, where it has only limited access to the foreign community.
CNN is not alone. Fox News is named for “a cunning animal.” Agence France-Presse, the large wire service based in Paris, “lies.” The BBC and a German newspaper are described in offensive terms that ought not to be repeated here.
As might be expected, the Dalai Lama is often attacked personally. But others are also objects of ire, including the US Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who has sponsored resolutions critical of China, and US Assistant Secretary of State Paula Dobriansky, the State Department’s coordinator of Tibetan affairs, who was termed “ignorant” and a teller of “a bare-faced lies.”
It will be interesting to see how Beijing deals with the foreign media as the Olympics approach. The Beijing Olympic committee says it expects 21,600 accredited journalists, of whom 16,000 will be broadcasters. Another 10,000 non-accredited journalists are also expected.
The president of the Beijing organizing committee, Liu Qi (劉淇), said in the preface of a 264-page media guide: “The freedom of foreign journalists in their news coverage will also be ensured.”
Since journalists can be a rambunctious lot and CCP is, if nothing else, obsessed with control, this could make for an explosive mix.
There were hints this week that some Chinese were beginning to worry that their rants might have gone too far. The People’s Daily called on Chinese to act like gentlemen with “a graceful bearing and an open mind.”
Said a Chinese in a blog posting: “Instead of reasonably and calmly discussing the position and why it may not be correct, I have seen many Chinese people resort to childish name-calling and angry rhetoric.”
“These rude Chinese,” the blog writer concluded, “are making China look bad.”
Richard Halloran is a writer base in Hawaii.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS