Pre-Olympics pressure on the Chinese government is beginning to pay off, with reports that Beijing is willing to meet representatives of the Dalai Lama.
It may be churlish to say, but it is also true: The Chinese are not floating talks because they feel regret over recent events in Tibet, nor because they are willing to entertain the suggestions of the Tibetan government-in-exile.
They are doing so because it throws a bone to other governments growing restless at Beijing’s intransigence and boorishness. An Olympics tournament stained by Chinese misanthropy at home and abroad is inevitable, so, for the Chinese, it’s now all about damage control.
Another example of the symbolic damage that China cannot help inflicting on itself came on Thursday with the latest torch debacle in Canberra.
The thing that made this leg of the relay different was the effort put into mobilizing thousands of sometimes hostile Chinese and Chinese-Australian protesters, whose tactics included verbal and physical assaults on a small number of pro-Tibet protesters. Vivid scenes of violence and jingoism demonstrated that this Olympic Games is headed irrevocably toward symbolic disaster.
Links between the Chinese embassy and the protesters have been alleged by the head of the local government that includes Canberra. This is hardly surprising, because Chinese embassy and consular officials are well known to have informal but proficient systems of surveillance throughout Australia’s Chinese community and civic organizations.
The message to people outside Australia is that the majority of people with Chinese heritage would not support the Chinese ambassador’s defiance toward law enforcement officials over the role of the paramilitary torch guardians, for example, nor the disrespectful behavior of the Chinese protesters.
The message to the Chinese protesters in Canberra, however, should be far less civil. It was not so long ago that Australia gave thousands of Chinese students sanctuary when their government massacred their fellows in the nation’s capital. Now, a generation later, today’s youth from the Central Kingdom — in this case, largely members of the elite — are acting as tools of that same government and (literally, in some cases) spitting in the face of democratic freedoms of their host country.
That so many Chinese and Chinese Australians abused their freedom to protest by turning the occasion into a celebration of intimidation and nationalist bile offers another wake-up call to those romantics who say that engaging China is in itself sufficient to produce a more civilized and open country.
It is one thing to attend a torch relay carrying a flag. It is another thing altogether to receive embassy support and money and carry placards praising the domination of Tibet at an event celebrating world peace.
Unfortunately for China, the damage is long done. All that remains is for Beijing to alienate even its sympathizers in the West as the Games approach.
Meeting with the representatives of the Dalai Lama is simply not enough, and although the prospect of more talks and genuine communication is tantalizing, the reality is that nothing will come of it unless other governments maintain their pressure and teach China, this empire of self-pity, the meaning of accountability.
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned