Turning off the lights for one hour to observe Earth Day might eliminate one hour of lighting electricity consumption, but it also means that people have to stop working for that hour.
This can be done once, but it’s impossible to ask people to work in the dark for extended periods. However, it might be feasible if our buildings were designed with natural ventilation and lighting.
Many office buildings are closed structures with sealed windows, and people draw the curtains and turn on fluorescent lights to avoid the heat of direct sunlight.
In fact, simple sunshades with a Venetian blind design can both reduce the use of lights and allow sufficient light to enter. Many convenience stores or grocery stores use dozens of fluorescent lights during the day, raising indoor temperatures and increasing the use of air-conditioning.
It should be possible to reduce artificial lighting while retaining the same indoor brightness. Reducing unnecessary lights would be even more energy-efficient than installing energy-efficient light bulbs.
We should take a comprehensive approach to saving energy and reducing carbon emissions and distinguish symbolic measures from those that require long-term efforts and have long-term effect. While some measures require infrastructure improvements, other can be easily achieved through management or by being implemented in daily life.
For example, we could promote “green consumption,” calling on the public to use green products for basic life necessities, by shopping at “green stores” or staying at environmentally friendly hotels when traveling.
Corporations should also be able to procure green products for their daily necessities, from factory interiors down to office appliances.
The public is often unclear on how to be environmentally friendly. People who think they are protecting the environment often do things that have the opposite effect. One example is a group of students who collected recyclable waste and turned it into art creations to promote recycling, but later threw it away.
Many stores also sell a wide selection of so-called “energy-efficient products,” but these include bogus green products that confuse consumers. Product quality should not drop or prices go up just because a product is labeled a green product.
A while ago there was a detergent sold in simple and environmentally friendly packaging, but the price was higher than detergent in normal packaging.
Policies should be written to prevent similar incidents from reoccurring.
It is very important to build a rigorous certification system to help consumers distinguish certified from non-certified green products.
At present, there are already eco-friendly, energy-efficient, water-saving and green building material labeling schemes.
These schemes use scientific methods and third-party certification to select the most environmentally friendly and energy-efficient products. There are still a lot of products that haven’t yet been included in this system, but if the government and business sector understand this, it should be possible to build a public consensus to expand the scope of green products.
One day, when we cannot buy products without eco-labels and all our buildings are built with green materials, Taiwan will have become a low-carbon emission society. If we all work together, it should be possible to bring about a large reduction in per capita carbon dioxide emissions.
Chen Wen-ching is vice president of the Environment and Development Foundation.
Translated by Ted Yang
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
Next week, the nation is to celebrate the Lunar New Year break. Unfortunately, cold winds are a-blowing, literally and figuratively. The Central Weather Administration has warned of an approaching cold air mass, while obstinate winds of chaos eddy around the Legislative Yuan. English theologian Thomas Fuller optimistically pointed out in 1650 that “it’s always darkest before the dawn.” We could paraphrase by saying the coldest days are just before the renewed hope of spring. However, one must temper any optimism about the damage being done in the legislature by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), under
To our readers: Due to the Lunar New Year holiday, from Sunday, Jan. 26, through Sunday, Feb. 2, the Taipei Times will have a reduced format without our regular editorials and opinion pieces. From Tuesday to Saturday the paper will not be delivered to subscribers, but will be available for purchase at convenience stores. Subscribers will receive the editions they missed once normal distribution resumes on Sunday, Feb. 2. The paper returns to its usual format on Monday, Feb. 3, when our regular editorials and opinion pieces will also be resumed.
This year would mark the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the India Taipei Association (ITA) in Taipei and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in New Delhi. From the vision of “Look East” in the 1990s, India’s policy has evolved into a resolute “Act East,” which complements Taiwan’s “New Southbound Policy.” In these three decades, India and Taiwan have forged a rare partnership — one rooted in shared democratic values, a commitment to openness and pluralism, and clear complementarities in trade and technology. The government of India has rolled out the red carpet for Taiwanese investors with attractive financial incentives
RSS