President-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) plans to boost the number of Chinese tourists entering the nation from 1,000 per day to 3,000 per day at the beginning of July. Ma has called this proposal — along with cross-strait flights — a small step that will boost the economy and improve relations with China in the short term, while paving the way for bigger steps such as implementing a bilateral cross-strait common market later. But we have to ask: Are these proposals well thought out?
The most important, in terms of sovereignty, is whether or not the visas issued to incoming tourists are considered international or domestic, an issue that Ma seems reluctant to face head on. Leaving this issue unresolved — or worse, solving it by using some silly moniker like “Chinese Taipei” — may turn what is billed as a bilateral agreement between two countries into an “internal affair.”
On the economic front, because China prohibits Taiwan from becoming a member of the IMF, we lack an adequate currency exchange mechanism to deal with the yuan. Aside from the fact that this is just another example of China encroaching on Taiwan’s international space, more practically it means that China doesn’t have to follow through on currency-clearing obligations.
The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) response to this conundrum is to change domestic laws and recognize the yuan as a legal foreign currency, while the NT dollar would not be viewed the same way in China, except in a few select places.
Though Ma spokesman Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) said the incoming administration would deal with the issue once in office, they haven’t set a clear timetable. Wouldn’t it be prudent to have an exchange mechanism in place that is “win-win” before a larger influx of Chinese tourists starts arriving?
Meanwhile, of the four airports chosen as entry points for Chinese tourists, only Taipei’s Songshan has yet to be equipped with the necessary infrastructure to handle tourists from China. Given that Ma was mayor of Taipei for two terms (during which time he constantly discussed implementing “direct flights”), we have to ask why the country’s largest city is not prepared for this development. Were they really planning for this or was it all just talk?
Though the country’s hotels and tourist shops eagerly await waves of Chinese tourists, Taiwan’s few historic and scenic areas are notoriously overcrowded. Roads are often narrow and dangerous and transportation vehicles are poorly serviced or outdated. Together with the environmental concerns that have been voiced over the past few months — most noticeably concerning Sun Moon Lake — as well as lingering fears over an outbreak such as SARS, it seems implementing cross-strait flights and increasing the number of tourists from China are policies being pushed forward without due consideration.
Opening up tourism to China is a litmus test for how Ma’s administration might deal with bigger issues such as a cross-strait common market. The public, academics and the media need to be given ample time to reflect on the policies of the incoming administration. Otherwise, these small steps may become a big headache for both Taiwanese and those hordes of Chinese tourists.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS