President-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) plans to boost the number of Chinese tourists entering the nation from 1,000 per day to 3,000 per day at the beginning of July. Ma has called this proposal — along with cross-strait flights — a small step that will boost the economy and improve relations with China in the short term, while paving the way for bigger steps such as implementing a bilateral cross-strait common market later. But we have to ask: Are these proposals well thought out?
The most important, in terms of sovereignty, is whether or not the visas issued to incoming tourists are considered international or domestic, an issue that Ma seems reluctant to face head on. Leaving this issue unresolved — or worse, solving it by using some silly moniker like “Chinese Taipei” — may turn what is billed as a bilateral agreement between two countries into an “internal affair.”
On the economic front, because China prohibits Taiwan from becoming a member of the IMF, we lack an adequate currency exchange mechanism to deal with the yuan. Aside from the fact that this is just another example of China encroaching on Taiwan’s international space, more practically it means that China doesn’t have to follow through on currency-clearing obligations.
The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) response to this conundrum is to change domestic laws and recognize the yuan as a legal foreign currency, while the NT dollar would not be viewed the same way in China, except in a few select places.
Though Ma spokesman Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) said the incoming administration would deal with the issue once in office, they haven’t set a clear timetable. Wouldn’t it be prudent to have an exchange mechanism in place that is “win-win” before a larger influx of Chinese tourists starts arriving?
Meanwhile, of the four airports chosen as entry points for Chinese tourists, only Taipei’s Songshan has yet to be equipped with the necessary infrastructure to handle tourists from China. Given that Ma was mayor of Taipei for two terms (during which time he constantly discussed implementing “direct flights”), we have to ask why the country’s largest city is not prepared for this development. Were they really planning for this or was it all just talk?
Though the country’s hotels and tourist shops eagerly await waves of Chinese tourists, Taiwan’s few historic and scenic areas are notoriously overcrowded. Roads are often narrow and dangerous and transportation vehicles are poorly serviced or outdated. Together with the environmental concerns that have been voiced over the past few months — most noticeably concerning Sun Moon Lake — as well as lingering fears over an outbreak such as SARS, it seems implementing cross-strait flights and increasing the number of tourists from China are policies being pushed forward without due consideration.
Opening up tourism to China is a litmus test for how Ma’s administration might deal with bigger issues such as a cross-strait common market. The public, academics and the media need to be given ample time to reflect on the policies of the incoming administration. Otherwise, these small steps may become a big headache for both Taiwanese and those hordes of Chinese tourists.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS