It was, in more ways than one, an image pregnant with meaning. Normally a photograph of the Spanish defense minister inspecting the nation’s troops would elicit little comment beyond those with a nerdish interest in medals and battle formations. But this time the minister was Carme Chacon, a 37-year-old mother-to-be with no previous military experience.
As TV footage of the seven-months pregnant Chacon was beamed into early morning households, some of the more conservative elements of Spanish society were already choking on their breakfast churros. A leading article in El Mundo dismissed it as “political marketing,” stating that Chacon’s profile “clashes with the traditional values and culture of the Spanish army.”
Aware perhaps of the consternation she would provoke, the new minister had attempted to dress neutrally for the occasion — a tailored black jacket and a white smock-top that artfully disguised her baby bump. Yet the visual contrast between this attractive young woman, heavy with child, and the straight-backed military men standing to attention with rifles and gleaming brass buttons was undeniably striking.
It marked a radical changing of the old guard, and from that one image a greater truth started to emerge. Chacon was one of nine women appointed last week by the Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero to the continent’s first female majority Cabinet. In a country still recovering from four decades of nationalist rule under General Francisco Franco — women in Spain were not allowed to have their own passports or bank accounts until after his death — Zapatero’s appointments signified a tectonic shift in social perception.
“It was a wonderful photo,” says Yvonne Galligan, director of the Center for the Advancement of Women in Politics at Queen’s University Belfast. “I am quite sure it was, to many Spaniards, an amazing sight, but you needed that media impact to unsettle the old gender order. That’s essentially what that image represented.”
Another photograph of Chacon visiting peacekeeping troops at Spain’s military base in Herat, northwest Afghanistan, on Saturday highlights the glaring juxtaposition of stereotypical male and female roles: the mother and the soldier; the protectors of the family and the protectors of the nation. She was accompanied on her trip by a medical team, including a gynecologist, and she plans to visit Spanish peacekeeping troops in Lebanon in the next few days.
Zapatero’s decision to give key roles to women is part of a broader trend. Over the past decade, Europe has seen a steady rise in the number of women in positions of political power. There are currently seven female foreign affairs ministers and, since 2000, there have been no fewer than 16 women chancellors of the exchequer. Finland and Germany have female leaders — Tarja Halonen and Angela Merkel. Sweden has adopted the unfortunately named “zipper” system, which ensures that if a man tops a party list, the second position must be occupied by a woman; in 2006, women took 164 parliamentary seats out of 349.
But while Nordic countries have long been at the vanguard of generating greater gender equality in Europe, the change has been particularly noticeable in nations that have traditionally prided themselves on their orthodox attitudes to hearth and home. In France, a country that denied women the vote until 1944, French President Nicolas Sarkozy has fulfilled an election pledge for greater parity between men and women by appointing seven women in a 15-strong Cabinet, including Minister for Justice Rachida Dati, Minister of Finance Christine Lagarde and Minister of the Interior Michele Alliot-Marie. In Italy, where prime-time television quiz shows are still presented by women wearing little more than spangly bikini bottoms and collagen-enhanced smiles, the re-elected Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has promised that at least a third of his ministers will be women. And in Spain, a nation that provided us with the word machismo, it is now legally enshrined that no more than 60 percent of party candidates can be male.
While it might seem as though Europe has suddenly been overrun by well-groomed women who attract more attention for their handbags than their portfolios, in truth there has been a long fermentation process. Statisticians attribute the feminization of such a traditionally male-dominated environment to the socioeconomic changes that have substantially altered the demographic landscape in mainland Europe over the past decade.
Elizabeth Villagomez, a senior partner at the Almenara Economic and Social Studies Institute in Madrid, points to the lowered birth rate in Spain as an indicator that women are delaying marriage, or eschewing it altogether. Over the past two decades, there has been an 87 percent rise in the employment rate among married women and a 48 percent drop in the fertility rate (in the past five years, this has gone up slightly, a fact that Villagomez attributes to an increase in immigrant families).
“Women in this country now make up more than 50 percent of university students and they are slowly taking hold,” she says. “The marriage market is being upset by this. Even if you do have a family, wages are very low so both parents must work and that has an impact on household power structures.”
“In cohabiting professional couples across Europe, the trend is for the woman to earn more than the man. That’s also happening in the US. I think politicians are very aware that women have acquired quite a bit of education and that they cannot be kept in the home. The appointment of so many women to the Cabinet is therefore market driven,” she says.
In Italy, where the fertility rate is now one of the lowest in the West, a similar picture is emerging. In 1950 only 7 percent of 14 to 17-year-old Italian girls went to school. Now, female university students outnumber male students and 80 percent of them go into full-time employment.
Even the unenlightened Berlusconi, a man who last week criticized Zapatero for making his government “too pink,” has been forced to take note. During his re-election campaign, he promised to shower women with Cabinet jobs, somewhat ruining the effect by claiming that right- wing women were “more beautiful” than those on the left.
Of course, not everyone is tripping along in a state of emancipated bliss. In Spain one woman a week dies as a result of domestic violence. Across the board, women earn less than their male counterparts.
And, as French Minister for Health, Youth Affairs and Sport Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin said: “There’s a difference between the idea of an equality law and the application of it in practice. There’s still some way to go. Women are very under-represented.”
The political sphere remains an overwhelmingly male arena, soaked through with the sort of cigar-chomping, back-slapping testosterone one might expect to find in a Turkish hamam. On the campaign trail, the 71-year-old Berlusconi, insisted that, at 1.71m, he was taller than Sarkozy or Russian President Vladimir Putin, as if it were a matter of state importance.
Wary of their growing anachronism in an increasingly female world, it seems as though male leaders are undergoing a collective midlife crisis. Berlusconi had a hair transplant four years ago and took to sporting an ill-judged white bandana, while the current boom in French men seeking Botox injections to keep up with their younger wives has been dubbed “the Sarkozy effect.” In recent months, we have been treated to the unedifying spectacle of some of the most powerful men in the world trying to outdo each other like schoolboys comparing conker sizes. Not wishing to be outshone, Putin swiftly brought in an array of glamorous new female recruits, reportedly in a bid to “sex up” the Duma.
The new politicians included Svetlana Khorkina, a 28-year-old blonde Olympic gymnast who caused a sensation by posing nude in Playboy magazine. It seems that political power is still inextricably linked with virility, as if an excessive show of masculinity will reassure voters that the virtue of their country is being protected against the aggressive advances of a European superstate.
In the UK, the Fawcett Society, which campaigns for gender equality, has estimated that at the present rate of progress the Labour party could take another 20 years to reach a position where half its parliamentary members are women. By the same calculation, the opposition Conservatives would take 400 years.
Edwina Currie, one of the women to make it into government with the British Conservatives, remains pessimistic about the prospects for parity.
“It’s great to see the progress that women are making in countries like Spain, Italy and France, but I don’t think we’ll see the same thing happening here,” the former junior health minister says.
When Zapatero was first elected four years ago, he insisted that “the more equality women have, the fairer, more civilized and tolerant society will be.”
All of which might be true, but only if Berlusconi leaves his bandana at home. Not even the most emancipated democracy can be expected to tolerate that.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS