Public protests against rising food and fuel prices in Haiti, in the Carribean Sea, have grown increasingly heated.
With a death toll of five, the violence is still expanding. On April 7, tens of thousands of people took to the street in the capital, Port-au-Prince.
On April 8, starving masses attempted to storm the presidential palace, demanding the resignation of President Rene Preval.
Such a crisis does not develop overnight: Problems in Haiti have been a long time in the making. For more than a hundred years, the Haitian government and public have been destroying the environment they depend on for their livelihood, and the consequences of their actions were inevitable. This should serve as a warning to Taiwan.
Haiti and the neighboring Dominican Republic are two parts of the island of Hispaniola, located to the east of Cuba in the Caribbean Sea. Both countries were European colonies and endured authoritarian rule for prolonged periods of time.
For decades after the 1930s, the Dominican Republic was governed by dictator Rafael Trujillo and later by Joaquin Balaguer.
The country’s approach to environmental protection was very different from that of Haiti resulting in the strong contrast that exists today.
Looking down from a plane, Haiti has a light yellow tinge and is covered in deforested hills, while the Dominican Republic is a luscious green and covered in vegetation.
Jared Diamond, a University of California, Los Angeles professor of geography and physiology who won the Pulitzer Prize in 1998 and the Aventis Prize for his book Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, spent an entire chapter of his 2005 book Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed on detailed descriptions and comparisons of these two countries.
Taiwan has developed a lot in the past five or six decades. At the same time, the country’s environment has been greatly damaged.
With president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) set to be inaugurated on May 20, some people have voiced concern that staffers in the Ma camp value development over environmental protection and that Ma and his team will neglect environmental issues.
I suggest that Ma and his advisers pay more attention to this issue and adopt a long-term approach.
In this respect, the Ma government should follow the Dominican Republic’s example, not Haiti’s.
I also hope that the public will monitor the new government to help protect the lifeblood of Taiwan’s sustainable existence so future generations will also have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty of Taiwan’s mountains and streams.
We need to protect the beautiful island on which we all depend.
Wang Chih-shao is a high school physics teacher.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS