After the head of the European Parliament invited the Dalai Lama to address the body on events in Tibet, parliament members passed a resolution urging China to resume talks with the Dalai Lama and called on EU leaders to boycott the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics in August.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced last Wednesday that he would not attend the opening ceremony of the Olympics, even though he had previously said he would attend.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy will also not rule out the possibility of boycotting the opening ceremony unless the Chinese government meets three conditions: ending violence against its population, releasing political prisoners and opening a dialogue with the Dalai Lama over recent events in Tibet.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel previously also declared that she would not be attending the opening ceremony.
In Italy, there are even calls for a boycott of the Olympics, as the majority of Italians, the right of center Northern League and the left of center radical parties all have expressed support for such a boycott.
Judging from former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi’s front-runner status in Italy’s upcoming elections, Italy is likely to promote such a boycott.
As a common position on the Tibet issue has gradually developed among the EU’s four largest countries, Poland, the Czech Republic, Lithuania and Estonia, and the European Parliament, many believe that other EU member states will be influenced and follow suit to safeguard human rights.
In the wake of protests against the Olympic torch relay in London, Paris and San Francisco, strong global support is building in defense of human rights in Tibet.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will not attend the opening ceremony, an aide has said.
International Olympic Committee chairman Jacques Rogge, US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, the Japanese government and the EU have spoken up in defense of human rights in Tibet, but democratic Taiwan has yet to express a firm view on the matter.
In order to facilitate broad cross-strait political and economic exchanges, Taiwan seems to intentionally brush aside the issue of Tibetan human rights while showing good will toward China.
Regrettably, Taiwan didn’t take advantage of China’s crackdown on the protests in Tibet to spotlight its democratic values.
Instead, Taiwan has chosen not to exhibit its democracy to the international community at this opportune moment.
After the new Taiwanese government comes to power, shouldn’t democratic Taiwan join forces with Western countries in an attempt to accelerate the democratization of China?
Chang Meng-jen is a doctoral candidate in Comparative European Politics at the University of Siena in Italy.
Translated by Ted Yang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS