The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has never been shy about putting party interests before national interests. So when Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) on Thursday promised the legislature’s full cooperation on budget matters after the new administration is sworn in, it came as no revelation.
After reports emerged that the incoming Cabinet would seek to bolster its budget by around NT$100 billion (US$3.3 billion), Wang said the legislature would pass any fiscal proposals by June. That’s 10 days after president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is inaugurated, which would certainly be quick work for a legislature that has made dragging its feet an art form.
Should the public be breathing a sigh of relief?
The fattened budget is intended to fund Ma’s “i-Taiwan 12 projects” — a series of infrastructure proposals that the government, already laboring under fiscal woes, can ill afford without raising taxes.
Nevertheless, as budget matters have for years been held hostage in a fierce power struggle between the pan-blue legislature and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Cabinet, Wang’s statement was an indication that the nation can probably look forward to cooperation on pivotal issues.
The clogged veins of the legislative floor should soon be flowing healthily again and other crucial bills that had fallen victim to partisan politics may may finally be passed.
However, Ma has yet to be inaugurated, the new Cabinet has yet to be named and many proposals have yet to land on legislators’ desks.
Wang’s premature pledge of cooperation was nothing more than a sign that the rules of the game haven’t changed: party blood runs as thick as ever.
The KMT caucus has drawn on myriad untenable excuses for blocking bills, arguing, for example, that it should not pass a budget for compensating victims of the 228 Incident because the Executive Yuan had requested that the funds be placed under the authority of the Ministry of Education.
Nor was there any indication in the months leading up to the presidential election that the caucus would change its tactics any time soon — despite its vow to serve the public responsibly in light of the extra powers it gained by securing an absolute majority in January.
On the anniversary of the 228 Incident, as Ma pledged to see through a budget for compensation if elected, the KMT caucus fended off criticism of its voting record by reiterating its dubious rationale for previously sabotaging the bill.
For this reason, a victory for DPP Chairman Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) in the presidential election would undoubtedly have meant another four years of vicious partisan wrangling, with crucial amendments left to languish.
The nation can look forward to smoother functioning government over the next four years, not because politicians are shaping up, but because a single party has secured both the executive and legislative branches. Real progress toward a mature democracy — and politicians who behave in a manner befitting democracy — will only come if the public demands it. Unfortunately, severe partisanship has very clearly served the KMT’s interests.
As it reaps the rewards, what incentive does it have to reform damaging habits?
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas. One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe. The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed
RSS