The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has never been shy about putting party interests before national interests. So when Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) on Thursday promised the legislature’s full cooperation on budget matters after the new administration is sworn in, it came as no revelation.
After reports emerged that the incoming Cabinet would seek to bolster its budget by around NT$100 billion (US$3.3 billion), Wang said the legislature would pass any fiscal proposals by June. That’s 10 days after president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is inaugurated, which would certainly be quick work for a legislature that has made dragging its feet an art form.
Should the public be breathing a sigh of relief?
The fattened budget is intended to fund Ma’s “i-Taiwan 12 projects” — a series of infrastructure proposals that the government, already laboring under fiscal woes, can ill afford without raising taxes.
Nevertheless, as budget matters have for years been held hostage in a fierce power struggle between the pan-blue legislature and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Cabinet, Wang’s statement was an indication that the nation can probably look forward to cooperation on pivotal issues.
The clogged veins of the legislative floor should soon be flowing healthily again and other crucial bills that had fallen victim to partisan politics may may finally be passed.
However, Ma has yet to be inaugurated, the new Cabinet has yet to be named and many proposals have yet to land on legislators’ desks.
Wang’s premature pledge of cooperation was nothing more than a sign that the rules of the game haven’t changed: party blood runs as thick as ever.
The KMT caucus has drawn on myriad untenable excuses for blocking bills, arguing, for example, that it should not pass a budget for compensating victims of the 228 Incident because the Executive Yuan had requested that the funds be placed under the authority of the Ministry of Education.
Nor was there any indication in the months leading up to the presidential election that the caucus would change its tactics any time soon — despite its vow to serve the public responsibly in light of the extra powers it gained by securing an absolute majority in January.
On the anniversary of the 228 Incident, as Ma pledged to see through a budget for compensation if elected, the KMT caucus fended off criticism of its voting record by reiterating its dubious rationale for previously sabotaging the bill.
For this reason, a victory for DPP Chairman Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) in the presidential election would undoubtedly have meant another four years of vicious partisan wrangling, with crucial amendments left to languish.
The nation can look forward to smoother functioning government over the next four years, not because politicians are shaping up, but because a single party has secured both the executive and legislative branches. Real progress toward a mature democracy — and politicians who behave in a manner befitting democracy — will only come if the public demands it. Unfortunately, severe partisanship has very clearly served the KMT’s interests.
As it reaps the rewards, what incentive does it have to reform damaging habits?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS