Taiwan is a Han-language society that has frequent exchanges with China. Aside from sharing a common language, Taiwan is also the Han-speaking society with the largest concentration of Tibetan Buddhists outside China. Taiwanese Buddhists and Tibetan monks have been closely connected for decades. This gives Taiwan the opportunity to play a key role as an emissary of peace between Tibetans and the Han.
First, the roots of Tibetan uprisings have often been religion-based. Tibet is a society that centers its life and culture on religion. However, under communist rule, the Chinese government has not only politically intervened in, but also attempted to control, religion.
Beijing has regulations for the management of Tibetan temples, which include compulsory “patriotic education” classes. Beijing kidnapped the 11th Panchen Lama, who was recognized by the Dalai Lama and whose whereabouts are unknown to this day. It named another boy as the reincarnation of the Panchen Lama in order to control Tibetan Buddhism, and thus Tibetans themselves.
This bid has not worked, but the Chinese are undeterred. Just last year, Beijing intensified its effort to control Tibetan Buddhists by passing a regulation on reincarnations in Tibetan Buddhism in an attempt to control the entire selection process.
The Chinese government has forced monks to oppose the Dalai Lama in public, or to become signatories of attacks on him. This has caused great anger among Tibetans and Buddhists. To Buddhists, libeling monks is a great sin — and criticism of the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, even more so.
Many of the recent protests and peaceful demonstrations originated in temples and were initiated by monks. As Buddhists, regardless of sect, the knowledge of these truths would undoubtedly lead to deep empathy with the psychological and physical torment and pain of the Tibetan monks.
We therefore urge Taiwanese Buddhists to express their compassion and support the practice of Buddhism by all Buddhists in the forms chosen by them.
Responding to the threat that hatred between the Han and Tibetans could be intensified by the Chinese government’s actions, the Dalai Lama issued an appeal to the Chinese people on March 28: “Chinese brothers and sisters -— wherever you may be — with deep concern I appeal to you to help dispel the misunderstandings between our two communities. Moreover, I appeal to you to help us find a peaceful, lasting solution to the problem of Tibet through dialogue in the spirit of understanding and accommodation.”
This is a compassionate Dalai Lama, as a monk, praying for the planting of a seed of harmony rather than hatred between the Han and Tibetans. We believe that so long as the Tibetan people are not granted their freedom, Chinese will also never have peace, as the fates of Tibetans and Han Chinese are intertwined.
Thus, Taiwanese have the responsibility to reveal the truth to the Chinese and deliver the message of peace from the Dalai Lama and Tibetans, to prevent the continued escalation of hatred between Chinese and Tibetans.
Chow Mei-li is president of Taiwan Friends of Tibet.
Translated by Angela Hong
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,