The government decided last night to apply for WHO membership and World Health Assembly (WHA) observer status this year under the name “Taiwan” again, an idea president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has opposed.
In an interview with the Central News Agency last week, Ma said he favored a bid for WHA observer status under the name “Chinese Taipei.” Saying there had not been any success in the quest to join international organizations with names other than “Chinese Taipei,” Ma said he believed that this was a workable title and one that Beijing has not objected to. He went on to say that he strongly opposed the idea of applying for full WHO membership under the name “Taiwan,” and criticized the government’s WHO bid last year as a “total embarrassment.”
It is amazing how quickly Ma can go from trumpeting slogans such as “Taiwan Moves Forward” and “Taiwan Will Definitely Win” during the presidential campaign, to “strongly opposed to the idea of using the name Taiwan to apply for full WHO membership.” Coupled with his reservation last week over the use of the word “Taiwan” on stamps to mark his inauguration, no wonder the Democratic Progressive Party caucus has accused him of “discarding the name ‘Taiwan’ like ‘toilet paper’” following his win on March 22.
While some say Ma is just being practical with his “Chinese Taipei” proposal, which might enable Taiwan to inch forward, it is still quite sad that he has not hesitated to criticize the government for embarrassing the country by using the name “Taiwan” while remaining silent about China’s efforts to blockade Taiwan internationally.
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) signed a five-point “vision for cross-strait peace” in April 2005. In that pact the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) agreed to push for negotiations on Taiwanese participation in international organizations and events, with priority placed on Taiwan’s WHO membership.
So why doesn’t Ma put that “agreement” to the test and see what Beijing’s promises are worth? Why rush to automatically downgrade Taiwan’s WHA bid to the ridiculous name of “Chinese Taipei”?
Ma has said that he would not “clash with China” should he be elected but his “self-censoring” approach makes one wonder about the fate of Taiwan in the international arena.
Vice president-elect Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) will attend the Boao Forum in China today and is very likely to meet Hu on the sidelines. Will Siew be upholding Taiwan’s dignity, or follow Ma’s “gentlemanly approach” and censor himself?
Choosing not to “clash” with China does not mean Beijing will leave Taiwan alone. Self-censorship will not stop China from obstructing Taiwan in international matters. Even before he takes office, Ma should be willing to defend the country’s name and dignity, rather than fall over himself with awkward constructs aimed at appeasing Beijing. He should keep in mind that he campaigned for and won election to be president of the Republic of China, not the Republic of Chinese Taipei.
If the president of the country can’t stand firm and defend his nation’s identity and title, why should anyone else?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS