Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was elected as the next president of Taiwan with the campaign slogan “Taiwan moves forward.” However, by visiting and paying his respects to the late dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) he is retreating into the past.
If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is a modern party that represents Taiwan and has a vision for the future, it would distance itself from Chiang. Instead it is displaying its true colors as a party of the past that suffers badly from historical amnesia.
Ma would be much better spending his time paying respect to the victims of the White Terror and making efforts of achieve transitional justice.
Taiwan needs to move forward in a spirit of harmony and reconciliation.
The president-elect should set a better example.
David Reid
Xindian
The proposal that Ma visit the US before his inauguration next month is a great idea that should serve the best interests of the US, China and Taiwan in the long run.
After reading Sushil Seth’s article (“Can Ma work cross-strait miracles?” page 8, March 28) and Li Chen-ching’s letter (Letters, page 8, March 29), I think that there are many considerations for the US to realistically endorse the request.
First, the US should realize that the most suitable time for Ma to visit Washington would be before his inauguration, good timing that will help warm up cross-strait relations.
US President George W. Bush has stressed that it is a fresh opportunity for China and Taiwan to solve long-term tensions.
He has also reiterated that a peaceful relationship between Taiwan and China will be beneficial to multilateral interest. A visit by Ma to the US before May 20 is a practical option for enhancing multilateral relations.
As China is busy coping with the hectic problems of Tibet and simultaneously bracing for the Olympic Games in August, endorsing Ma’s unofficial visit to the US before his inauguration is a pragmatic and acceptable arrangement, signifying harmony and cooperation for all in the years to come.
Debbie Hou
Taipei
Public health is one of Taiwan’s greatest strengths. Its National Health Insurance was already one of the best single-payer systems in the world, ensuring that everyone has coverage while staying nimble in the face of financial challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic was a chance for the world to see Taiwan’s full public health apparatus at work. Officials caught wind of a strange virus circulating in China and jumped to screen and then stem the flow of travelers before the word “coronavirus” even made headlines. It was one of the only countries in the world to escape widespread transmission before vaccines were distributed,
The Chinese Ministry of Commerce on Oct. 12 announced that it would consider adopting further measures in response to Taiwan’s trade barriers on certain goods from China, based on the findings of an investigation it launched late last year. The measures could include tariffs or other forms of economic pressure. The announcement is yet another political move by Beijing that is more declarative than substantive. The timing was not coincidental, as it came shortly after President William Lai (賴清德) delivered his first Double Ten National Day speech after taking office on May 20, which was moderate on the cross-strait relationship,
On Monday morning last week, many Chinese investors woke up anticipating a raft of new stimulus measures to save the Chinese economy during an official Chinese Communist Party (CCP) news conference. Instead, by about 5am the CCP had launched military exercises surrounding Taiwan. State media announced that China would “completely reunify” Taiwan with its “ancestral homeland.” The refurbished Liaoning aircraft carrier, which had only days prior returned to its home berth at Yuchi Naval Base in China’s Shandong Province, was rushed back out to sea to traverse the Bashi Channel separating Taiwan and the Philippines to take its position for the exercises. The
China’s “Joint Sword-2024B” military exercises around Taiwan last week have sparked concerns in Taipei and allied capitals that Beijing’s risk tolerance is increasing, and rather than prioritizing efforts toward “peaceful unification,” it is ramping up efforts to bring about unification by force, whether that be a military quarantine, blockade or full-scale invasion. Catherine Lila Chou (周怡齡) and Mark Harrison are right in their recent book Revolutionary Taiwan: Making Nationhood in a Changing World Order that the nature of Beijing’s one-party political system, in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is always right, means Taiwanese identity is explained away as being the