It is an indication of how desperate the Chinese government has become that it should blame the Western media for “distorted reports and coverage” on Tibet.
The Associated Press quoted Kuang Weilin (鄺偉林), deputy consul-general at the Chinese consulate in New York, as saying on Thursday that the Western media, and CNN and the BBC in particular, had produced “misleading reports and comments, distorted facts and wrong conclusions, wrong judgments.”
Even casual audiences would find this comment amusing, especially given that CNN and BBC were singled out for “cropping” photos, a practice — together with airbrushing — that the Chinese government itself mastered long ago to eliminate political liabilities.
Whereas countries like Cuba and even Zimbabwe tend to attack media outlets based on their national ties, China has gone one further by implying that the Western media as a whole have launched a conspiracy against Beijing by aligning themselves with the Dalai Lama and Tibetan “independence forces” in a program of mass deception.
As dissembling statements go, this one is right up there with warnings of Tibetan suicide bombers and the nefarious activities of the ubiquitous — yet oddly invisible — “Dalai Lama clique.”
What is remarkable, and sad, about this situation is that when faced with new challenges to its credibility, 21st century China is reverting to the traditional and least credible response: Blaming foreigners en masse and creating enemies within where none need exist. It is “unfair treaty” psychology writ large for globalized media and economies. It is also breathtakingly infantile and will gain no friends among foreigners with money to invest.
It is crucial to understand that the Chinese approach to this issue will not restrict itself to unhappy minorities. With China touting itself as the next capitalist mecca (albeit without such troubling language), economists and financial analysts must harbor some concern that the inevitable economic lull will be accompanied by similar attacks on the foreign media attempting to hold the Chinese government and industry to account.
The professional kleptocracy of Singapore has mastered the balance of an unfree press and relatively transparent information on trade and policy. As much as the Singaporeans would love China to grow in sophistication using its candy-coated autocracy as a model, the basic dilemma is that Beijing has neither the independent agencies nor the skills to emulate its Confucian cousin.
China’s development can only be assured if the government can relent and have faith in the ability of its own people to speak and to be heard without fear of retribution. This is all the more important now that foreign investment places pressure on the government to modernize its regulatory systems and legal channels.
But China does not — indeed, in its current state, cannot — believe in a free press. This means that any “evidence” it presents to rebut allegations and reports — even on economic subjects — can be no more credible than the florid junk that Cultural Revolution wordsmiths churned out to disguise turmoil and praise mismanagement.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS