One global market, deregulation of government market intervention, privatization and public welfare cuts lie at the heart of neoliberal thought on economic globalization. The opening of China's markets is one concrete link in the implementation of neoliberal globalization. Many economists believe that neoliberal economic globalization is leading to the creation of M-shaped societies, with a vanishing middle class.
In Taiwan, income disparity has widened in recent years, with the income of the lower and middle classes dropping while the rich become richer. Many also feel that living standards are falling. As incomes in China and other developing countries rise, the demand for raw materials and food products have increased sharply, resulting in imported inflation on a global scale further adding to the financial burden in Taiwan.
The globalization of Taiwan's economy is in fact taking place in step with cross-strait economic integration. There has been little shift in economic policy despite the change in government from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) eight years ago. The problems facing Taiwan today are still the same - low investment, the undermining of industry and shrinking domestic demand, resulting in growing unemployment and falling national income. All these can be attributed to two reasons: excessive investment in China and an ineffective administration. President-elect Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) policy of comprehensive economic cross-strait integration will only result in a further deterioration of the nation's economic problems.
Both the DPP regime's and Ma's future strategy for economic development continues to adhere to this neoliberal framework for economic globalization. This kind of thinking will only lead to further economic integration with China and the formation of a "one China" market. The problem has nothing to do with the independence/unification issue; instead, it is related to the idea of a political economy.
Sweden is a good negative example. Sweden's social democracy and public welfare system are often praised as exemplary, but starting in the 1990s, the country's intellectual and political elite lost their way in the neoliberal myth of economic globalization. Ignoring the wishes of the lower and middle classes, the government started an energetic push for globalization that resulted in the public welfare system collapsing. The belief that markets would regulate themselves effectively hurt the Swedish economy and full employment turned into double-digit unemployment.
Taiwan is facing a situation that is different from Sweden. The Swedish public is opposed to globalization and wants to return to the old social democratic and public welfare paradigm, while the Swedish elite is enamored with globalization. In Taiwan, however, the public supports the political and intellectual elite's dogmatic pursuit of globalization and the comprehensive opening and integration of the cross-strait economies. They do this to the point that they do not detect that Ma's economic policies in fact do not differ very much from the policies of the DPP with which they are so dissatisfied. Ma will only lead the nation in a direction resulting in more economic suffering and hardships.
Taiwan's suffering public has a right to know the truth about neoliberal globalization and a right to choose a path that leads to social democracy and public welfare. This, however, is not happening, and is a result of laziness among the intellectual and political elite. Four years from now, will we be able to choose another path if we realize that Taiwan has taken a wrong turn?
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang Ming University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another
RSS