If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, White House security advisers will eventually come to believe it. So it is with the stubborn myth of the "1992 consensus" between Taiwan and China, which now has the distinction of tricking Stephen Hadley, national security adviser to US President George W. Bush, into thinking that it ever existed.
Discussing a telephone conversation between Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The problem with this, of course, is that no such basis has ever been accepted by Taiwan's government, and any hope of a true consensus -- formalizing the idea of "one China," but with different interpretations -- was overwhelmed by former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The "1992 consensus" has new impetus today partly because of its utility for the incoming administration of president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (
In 2006, Lee repudiated the term "1992 consensus," and in so doing it emerged that the term was manufactured by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) think tank guru and former legislator Su Chi (
These days, it seems, fiction has a role to play in cross-strait affairs if it fits the template of peaceful deference to Chinese sensibilities.
For Hadley's benefit, it should be said that Su is no stranger to creative tweaking of reality. He had a role to play in the dissemination to the US Congress of the Bulletgate leaflet composed by KMT think tank members. This ham-fisted propaganda campaign meant to serve as a framework for the pan-blue-camp fantasy that the assassination attempt on Chen and the vice president on the eve of the 2004 presidential election was staged.
Then there were his allegations in late 2005 that the Taipei Times was being manipulated by the DPP government -- a laughable insult for which no evidence was presented.
At the time this all seemed more hilarious than offensive. But with Su in the running for secretary-general of the National Security Council, things are not so funny anymore.
Whether in the habit of slandering media outlets that oppose his ideology, fabricating the diplomatic record or actively eroding confidence in the nation's prosecutors and police, one must ask whether a politician who can hypnotize people with such bunkum -- at home and abroad -- should be allowed anywhere near an institution that is charged with monitoring the security of a free country.
Then one must ask what comes next if that person actually gets the job.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS