As Viktor Seliverstov works in his makeshift studio in this hardscrabble Siberian town, he is enveloped in a cloud of ivory dust. His electric carving tool whirs over the milky surface of the teeth and tusks, as he whittles them into key fobs, knife handles and scrimshaw figurines.
But these are not whale bones or walrus tusks he is working on. The ivory in this part of the world comes from the remains of extinct woolly mammoths, as their remains emerge from the tundra where they have been frozen for thousands of years. It is a traditional Russian business that had all but gone extinct itself during the Soviet period, but is flourishing now.
"A lot of people find ivory and don't know what to do with it," Seliverstov said of the residents of this town, where more than a few closets and old barns have a tusk or two in them.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Seliverstov recently paid US$500 for about 16 pounds (7.2kg) of mammoth ivory from a family that had stashed it in a barn for years before realizing its value.
The trade, given a lift recently by global warming, which has melted away the tundra and exposed more frozen remains, is not only legal but actually endorsed by conservationists. They note somewhat grudgingly that while the survival of elephants may be in question, it is already too late for mammoths. Mammoth ivory from Siberia, they say, meets some of the Asian demand for illegal elephant ivory, and its trade should be encouraged.
The business of ice age ivory, a mainstay in Siberia since the 17th century, was further helped by the international ban imposed on the elephant ivory trade in 1989. Russian exports of mammoth ivory -- the only type of ivory legally imported into the US -- reached 36.2 tonnes last year, up from just 1.8 tonnes in 1989, said Aleksei Tikhonov, the director of the Zoological Museum in St. Petersburg and an expert on mammoths.
While prices vary, leading dealers in Moscow usually ask US$150 to US$200 a pound for average-grade ivory. By the time it reaches Western markets, the same ivory can sell for as much as US$800 a pound, dealers say.
The sources are varied, though reindeer herders, oil and gas workers and professional ivory hunters provide the bulk of the supply.
"They gather tusks like mushrooms after the rain, literally," Tikhonov said.
While mammoth tusks may not be as valuable as Russia's deposits of oil and natural gas, they are plentiful. The Siberian permafrost blankets millions of square kilometers, ranging in depth from a few meters to more than 1km and resembling frozen spinach.
Hidden in one of the upper layers of this mass, corresponding to the Pleistocene Epoch, are the remains of an estimated 150 million mammoths. Some are frozen whole, as if in suspended animation, others in bits and pieces of bone, tusk, tissue and wool.
Woolly mammoths are actually the last of three extinct elephantine species that inhabited Siberia. They appeared about 400,000 years ago and lasted at least until 3,600 years ago -- the age of some mammoth remains found on an island off the northern coast of the Russian region of Chukotka in 1993.
The tusks emerge with the spring thaw or after heavy rains, or along the eroding banks of rivers. A boom in gas and oil investment has added another source, as crews dig wells and pipeline ditches. Fresh from the permafrost, mammoth ivory is nearly pristine, though with a characteristic green patina. But if left outside and exposed to the elements, it will disintegrate within three years into worthless splinters.
That is another point in favor of the mammoth ivory trade, said Tikhonov, the Russian mammoth expert. It encourages the gathering of tusks that would otherwise be lost. In fact, he said, vastly more mammoth ivory is destroyed in this natural cycle in Russia than is ever found and sold, perhaps hundreds of tonnes of ivory per year.
Gary Haynes, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Nevada, Reno, said he could not help cringing at seeing the tusks destroyed. In the growth rings and possible prehistoric human butcher marks, they hold a wealth of data on the ancient climate and peoples of Siberia that could shed light on, among other things, the debate over whether climate change or overhunting, or both, felled the mammoths.
"There's a kind of discomfort when you're a scientist and you see something that could have scientific value being carved up and destroyed," Haynes said in a telephone interview. "But this is the trade-off. I see the businessman's arguments, too. Mammoths are already extinct and people need an economy."
In addition, the Russian government examines the tusks to make sure none bearing signs of ancient disease, prehistoric human markings or other scientifically valuable elements are exported.
About 90 percent of the Siberian ivory that is recovered is exported to Asia, where it is principally used in the manufacture of personal seals that in Japan, China and South Korea are used in place of signatures for business transactions. These seals support much of the Siberian industry.
While tusks are plentiful on the surface, whole frozen mammoths are not. They are also not exported. Most recently, a Nenets herdsman discovered a frozen calf on the Yamal Peninsula in May. It has been named Lyuba and is kept in a freezer in Tikhonov's museum in St. Petersburg. Scientists are sampling its tissue for a scientific effort to sequence the mammoth genome.
Tikhonov dismissed cloning as improbable.
Seliverstov, the ivory carver, said he had no qualms about working with a prehistoric resource.
"People will treasure my art for generations," he said. "I give the mammoths a second life."
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022