As expected, Ma Ying-jeou (
In other words, Ma's election victory has created a sense of relief in both China and the US. Washington worried about Chen's presumed propensity to provoke China. The US hopes that, under Ma's presidency, China and Taiwan will get along better, thus removing a regional flashpoint that has the potential of involving the US in confrontation with China.
As US President George W. Bush put it: "I believe the election provides a fresh opportunity to reach out and engage one another in peacefully resolving their differences."
Bush also pointed out that: "The maintenance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and the welfare of the people on Taiwan remain of profound importance to the United States." How this all work out remains to be seen.
One thing is certain, though, that Chen's legacy of fostering a distinct Taiwanese identity is here to stay. Ma's election-time statements on Tibet and the Olympics would seem to suggest that Taipei might not do China's bidding. He has criticized Beijing's repression in Tibet, emphasizing that Taiwan might not participate in the Beijing Olympics, if things get worse in Tibet.
Ma would like to sign a peace accord with Beijing, but China would have to remove missiles targeting Taiwan.
Going by these utterances, Ma might prove a tougher nut to crack for Beijing than it thought. Or Beijing might dismiss his utterances as simple grandstanding to win the election.
But if Ma means to be assertive with China, the relationship is unlikely to be as smooth as everyone is led to believe.
For now, though, Beijing is simply relieved to see the back of Chen and his DPP. With the election over, the hard task of dealing with China will begin. And if Ma is serious that "we will not negotiate the issue of reunification with the mainland," it will be interesting to see how China will react.
Of course, to mollify China, Ma has also said that his administration will not "support Taiwan's de jure independence." He believes that within the broad concept of "one China," both sides might be free to interpret it in their own way. In other words, Taipei will seek to deal with the political side of the relationship through creative ambiguity.
That means Taiwan will maintain its identity and de facto sovereign status without challenging the broad concept of "one China" -- a status quo of sorts.
Ma might have his own reasons to believe that China will fall for this, though it didn't in the past. Either Ma is overestimating his reach or China somehow might agree to accommodate him.
There is a view that, after the gyrations of the Chen period, Beijing will settle for anything short of overt independence for Taiwan. But, so far, there is nothing to suggest that Beijing will settle for creative ambiguity on the question of Taiwan's status.
For instance, while welcoming Ma's election, the Chinese media reportedly referred to him as "leader of the Taiwan region." Indeed, there is nothing to suggest either that Beijing will consider a peace accord with the new administration.
Ma believes that his pragmatic approach to China, based on a wide-range of initiatives like developing a European-style common market, establishing direct air, sea and mail links, fostering tourism and so on, will generate enough momentum to make the relationship work. Above all, he seems to believe that after Chen, China will find him a breath of fresh air.
However, Beijing might not find much comfort in some of his statements. For instance, he reportedly said: "I have been a long-term anti-communist [and] I also recognize that mainland China is a threat to Taiwan's security, with nearly 1,000 missiles deployed against us."
For Ma, China is also "an opportunity for Taiwan's economy." Taiwan would, therefore, "need to minimize the first and maximize the second." How this juxtaposition of security threat and business opportunity would be reconciled is left unclear.
One can only hope that Ma has a clear strategy to get the most out of Taiwan's difficult relationship with China.
Having voted him into power, Taiwanese have high expectations for Ma. Will he be Taiwan's political Houdini? Time will tell.
Sushil Seth is an Australian-based writer.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
RSS