Despite strenuous Chinese efforts to stifle the flow of information out of Tibet on the uprising there, the stream of dispatches continues and has begun to confront Chinese leaders with a dilemma: What do they do about the Olympics scheduled to open in Beijing on Aug. 8?
Does China go ahead and risk more adverse reports from the horde of 10,000 athletes, 20,000 foreign journalists, and tens of thousands of spectators who will descend on Beijing?
Or do the Chinese renege on their promise to open the country for the games? Or, as has already been speculated in Asia, does China call off the games rather than be subjected to close-up international scrutiny.
US President George W. Bush, who has accepted China's invitation to the games, is also being confronted with a dilemma.
Does the president, who has emphasized human rights in his foreign policy, go to Beijing and appear to condone the actions of a repressive regime? Or does he stay home and incur the wrath of China's rulers with whom the US already has tenuous relations? All of this begins to come in to focus tomorrow when the Olympic torch is to be lit in Greece, home of the ancient Olympics, and to start wending its 130-day, 132,288km journey ending in Beijing in August. It initiates the showcasing of China's emergence as an economic powerhouse and prominent political actor on the international stage.
In sum, the Beijing Olympic games are all about national pride.
Under normal circumstances, anti-Chinese riots in Lhasa might have been passed off as a local disturbance in a China that has recently experienced 75,000 instances of civil strife a year. This time, however, a correspondent for the Economist magazine was on the scene by happenstance.
So were groups of Japanese and Western tourists who were interviewed after they came out of Tibet.
US newspapers had correspondents, forbidden to enter Tibet, interview Tibetans living in the provinces that border on Tibet. More dispatches were cobbled together in Hong Kong. But Russia, host to the winter Olympics in 2014, seemed to ignore China's problems.
A headline in Pravda said: "Chinese prepare to live in hell for 2008 Summer Olympics," meaning no smoking in public places.
In China itself, Chinese TV and the Xinhua news agency covered the outbursts but played them down.
"A handful of lawless people, chanting separatist slogans in downtown Lhasa, burnt civilian houses and shops, destroyed vehicles, killed 13 innocent people, and seriously injured a dozen of law-enforcers," Xinhua reported.
The Economist was more vivid.
"Chinese shopkeepers in Lhasa's old Tibetan quarter knew better than the security forces that the city had become a tinder-box. As word spread rapidly through the narrow alleyways on March 14th that a crowd was throwing stones at Chinese businesses, they shuttered up their shops and fled. The authorities, caught by surprise, held back as the city was engulfed by its biggest anti-Chinese protests in decades," the London-based magazine reported.
The dispatch by the correspondent, unnamed as is the magazine's style, went on with trenchant analysis: "Years of rapid economic growth, which China had hoped would dampen separatist demands, have achieved the opposite. Efforts to integrate the region more closely with the rest of China, by building the world's highest railway connecting Beijing with Lhasa, have only fueled ethnic tensions in the Tibetan capital."
The dispatches recalled the gathering of the foreign press and television in Beijing in 1989 when then Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev visited China. Those journalists were on hand to report on the eruption of demonstrations by pro-democracy activists in Tiananmen Square that generated worldwide attention, especially when Chinese troops killed uncounted hundreds of demonstrators.
At a briefing on Thursday, Bush press secretary Dana Perino indicated that the US president still intended to go to the Olympics, but was careful not to commit the president. When a correspondent suggested that the president's presence in Beijing would be seen as a political statement, Perino said: "Certainly the president wants to make sure that our athletes have a really good experience."
That seemed to leave the president enough wiggle room to stay home if the politics of this election year so demanded.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS