Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Even if Ma's original statement -- since qualified with two conditions -- was a throwaway comment designed to make him sound tough on China ahead of tomorrow's presidential election, he should at least be commended for suggesting things that other governments around the world seem frightened even to mention.
Some of the criticism leveled at Ma -- such as that of Sports Affairs Council Chairman Yang Chung-ho (
Meanwhile, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh's (
Does Hsieh mean that if he is elected president and China belittles Taiwan during the Games, he will not ask our athletes to come home?
Given its Olympic history, the oft-quoted chestnut that sports and politics don't mix does not apply to Taiwan. Taiwan was absent from the 1976 and 1980 Games because of interference from China, while the nation's Olympic flag and anthem are stark testimony to the sad reality that politics does spill into the stadium.
Add this to the fact that the Beijing Olympics amount to one big political exercise designed to celebrate the Chinese Communist Party's international clout, and one can only conclude that the saying is bunkum.
By criticizing Ma, the DPP chairman is being hypocritical. The decision made by the government to reject the Olympic torch route was entirely a political one.
It is odd to suggest that an athlete's personal desire to win a gold medal should take precedence over national interests and dignity. After all, the first thing most athletes do after claiming a gold medal is grab their national flag and celebrate with a lap of honor or other show.
Given the increasing stranglehold Beijing is placing on Taiwan in the international arena and its track record of meddling in even the most trivial events in an effort to quash Taiwan's international space, it is inevitable that the Chinese government will try to demean Taiwan in some fashion during the Games. Its actions may be highly visible and noticeable to the international community or may take the form of subtler attacks on Taiwan's sovereignty that will be apparent only to the Chinese-speaking world.
And if Beijing does try something, then the nation's athletes -- regardless of how many years of sweat and hard work they have put into training -- should not need to be told what to do by politicians; they should be on the first plane home before those in power have even had a chance to speak out.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
“If you do not work in semiconductors, you are nothing in this country.” That is what an 18-year-old told me after my speech at the Kaohsiung International Youth Forum. It was a heartbreaking comment — one that highlights how Taiwan ignores the potential of the creative industry and the soft power that it generates. We all know what an Asian nation can achieve in that field. Japan led the way decades ago. South Korea followed with the enormous success of “hallyu” — also known as the Korean wave, referring to the global rise and spread of South Korean culture. Now Thailand