The economy and standard of living are both important issues in the presidential election campaign. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
The main difference between the two candidates may in fact lie in the manner in which they want to open up toward China. Ma wants a wider opening, while Hsieh stresses that national security must be a consideration and that the opening of cross-strait trade should be more limited, focusing more on global markets. Although both candidates are talking about a prosperous economy, neither of their economic prescriptions may be what Taiwan needs at this stage.
Although the 5.7 percent economic growth Taiwan experienced last year cannot compare with the double digit growth of developing countries, it was a brilliant performance for an economically developed country. Despite this, many Taiwanese still feel life is hard. Why?
The discrepancy between economic data and daily life is the result of deteriorating income distribution -- economic growth has not trickled down from the top earners to the lower income levels, resulting in an M-shaped distribution. High income earners are monopolizing most of the benefits from capital investments and technological innovation, while middle class incomes are not seeing gains, with many people even falling behind and joining the ranks of low income households, feeding a rapid increase in the newly poor.
This income distribution is the result of globalization and competition with China. Salaries are kept down by China's low prices and cheap labor. As Taiwanese demand higher salaries, companies relocate to China, resulting in a virtual salary freeze in Taiwan over the past few years. As soon as local product prices increase, similar but inferior Chinese products are introduced. Meanwhile the Taiwanese public is also suffering from cost increases brought on global increases in oil, grain and raw material prices.
Although both candidates want to promote economic growth, failure to address unequal income distribution might make that problem even worse, causing even more people to feel exploited. In particular, Ma's 633 policy and his all out promotion of economic growth might have an even bigger negative impact on income distribution than Hsieh's economic policy suggestions, especially since Ma's "cross-strait common market" proposal means further deregulating labor, product and capital exchanges. As far as products, prices, salaries and capital movement go -- these changes could add fuel to the fire of negative impact.
Ma's economic thinking seems to be based on the outdated mindset of a developing country. He seems unable to recognize that Taiwan has already entered the low to medium economic growth phase of a developed economy. At this stage, high economic growth will not necessarily have a positive impact on Taiwan's development because problems are no longer of a supply character, but are rather related to income distribution.
More emphasis on social justice and concern for welfare policies for the lower income levels are what this country really needs.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS