A DRAFT LAW on resolving medical disputes and a draft compensation act have been discussed for more than 10 years. To resolve disputes involving hospitals, doctors and family members, the Department of Health recently came up with a plan for a childbirth risk compensation fund that would pay up to NT$2 million (US$65,000) without assigning blame if a mother or newborn dies or is harmed.
The Taiwan Health Reform Foundation believes that only by being fair and just will this system be acceptable to the paying public and medical professionals.
Quick compensation for patients in the case of no-fault medical injuries will minimize conflict between the patient's family and doctors and is a direction that the foundation supports, although methods of financing need to be discussed further.
According to the current plan, obstetricians pay NT$2,000 to the fund for every child they deliver, and the government pays the rest -- the lion's share -- through the budget.
This means the public as a whole bears the cost of medical risk, which is reasonable. However, the authorities must give further consideration to whether the contributions of obstetricians should be shifted onto all pregnant women so that healthy mothers and babies also shoulder the cost of risk.
The plan would have a pregnant woman or a family member sign a standard agreement through which compensation from the childbirth risk compensation fund can be issued in case the mother or her child is injured or dies during childbirth in lieu of formal legal action.
Whether or not the agreement is signed, however, problems arise. If it is not signed, will the doctor be more careful, or will he or she refuse to help the patient altogether?
If the agreement is signed and injury occurs, the lack of a thorough explanation might mean that the patient and her family are unaware that they retain the right to take legal action provided that they do not accept the compensation. The standard agreement must clearly explain that this choice exists. Even more important, if medical negligence is established, will the doctor or the hospital avoid responsibility because compensation is paid by a third party? Is it proper that responsibility for medical negligence not be investigated?
The foundation thinks that if the issue of responsibility is ignored and there is no investigation, then hospital management and medical personnel may not learn from any mistakes.
Action should therefore be taken so that personnel who are negligent face the consequences of their actions and act to avoid repeating their mistakes. The managing committee for the compensation fund should therefore be able to recover compensation money from negligent practitioners.
This system has been influenced by the Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Act of Virginia in the US, as well as laws to solve no-fault medical disputes in New Zealand and Sweden.
It is, however, important to note that Sweden and New Zealand have a complete social welfare system to take further care of seriously injured patients, while compensation money is only a supplementary resource.
Taiwan, on the other hand, doesn't have a well-planned support system for early intervention for children, or long-term care for comatose patients or physically disabled people.
How long can compensation of up to NT$2 million support these patients? These are all matters that the government should consider when drafting the law on resolving medical disputes.
Chang Ly-yun is the chairman of the Taiwan Health Reform Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump is an extremely stable genius. Within his first month of presidency, he proposed to annex Canada and take military action to control the Panama Canal, renamed the Gulf of Mexico, called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy a dictator and blamed him for the Russian invasion. He has managed to offend many leaders on the planet Earth at warp speed. Demanding that Europe step up its own defense, the Trump administration has threatened to pull US troops from the continent. Accusing Taiwan of stealing the US’ semiconductor business, it intends to impose heavy tariffs on integrated circuit chips
RSS